Wells Fargo named in new 401(k) lawsuit

Wells Fargo named in new 401(k) lawsuit
The company has been sued again over its use of its own products in its retirement plan
MAR 17, 2020

Wells Fargo has been sued, again, over the use of the company’s own investment products in its 401(k) plan.

Plaintiff Yvonne Becker, who was a participant in Wells’ $40 billion 401(k) plan and an employee for 26 years, filed a class-action lawsuit against Wells Fargo Friday in U.S. District Court in the Northern District of California.

Ms. Becker alleges that the company, along with the 401(k) plan committee, several individuals and Galliard Capital Management, violated sections of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act.

The allegations center on the inclusion of several collective investment trusts in the plan, including Wells Fargo’s target-date series. The suit alleges that the investments were poorly chosen, as less expensive, better-performing products were available from third parties.

The target-date CIT series was created in 2016, which in itself was a problem, the plaintiff wrote.

“Despite the lack of a track record, the committee defendants ‘mapped,’ or transferred, nearly $5 billion of participant retirement savings from the plan’s previous target date option into the target date CITs,” the complaint stated. “At a minimum, prudent fiduciary process requires a three-year performance history for an investment option prior to its inclusion in a plan.”

Since the time the products were launched, the plan allegedly suffered at least $100 million in “losses” due to underperformance, the plaintiff wrote.

The target-date CITs also invested in underlying CITs that were Wells Fargo products, according to the complaint.

It is not the first time the company has faced allegations of improper self-dealing in its 401(k) plan.

A separate class-action case involving the prior target-date series used in the plan was unsuccessful. That case was dismissed in 2017, and an appeals court upheld the dismissal in 2018. In that lawsuit, a plaintiff alleged that Wells Fargo acted improperly by including its target-date mutual fund series in the plan menu when a less expensive option from Vanguard was available.

The lead plaintiff in the new lawsuit is represented by law firm Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll, which also represented plaintiffs in the prior lawsuit involving the target-date mutual funds.

A Wells Fargo spokesman said in an email that the firm is reviewing the allegations.

Latest News

Why don't nearly half of Americans have any investments?
Why don't nearly half of Americans have any investments?

Janus Henderson survey exposes lack of education, generational divides, and gender gaps in investing behaviors.

A $40 trillion opportunity for financial advisors
A $40 trillion opportunity for financial advisors

The best investment advisors can make now is in their tax-planning knowledge.

Advisors’ wallets and hearts have to agree before selling their firm
Advisors’ wallets and hearts have to agree before selling their firm

Advisor-owners must acknowledge from the start that the keep/sell decision is a multi-faceted and difficult choice to make.

Meeting minutes show a Fed divided over size of September rate cut
Meeting minutes show a Fed divided over size of September rate cut

Last month's near-unanimous FOMC decision wasn't as clean as the final announcement suggested.

Facet looks further to the future with $35M funding
Facet looks further to the future with $35M funding

The tech-powered financial planning firm is using its latest financing to advance key initiatives and keep supporting its disruptive model.

SPONSORED Destiny Wealth Partners: RIA Team of the Year shares keys to success

Discover the award-winning strategies behind Destiny Wealth Partners' client-centric approach.

SPONSORED Explore four opportunities to elevate advisor-client relationships

Morningstar’s Joe Agostinelli highlights strategies for advisors to deepen client engagement and drive success