Why more Social Security claimants are waiting past 62

Why more Social Security claimants are waiting past 62
Shifts in workplace retirement benefits, other factors, making delaying benefits even more valuable.
MAY 04, 2015
Retirees are finally getting the message about the benefits of waiting to claim Social Security. A recent report from the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College shows that a declining number of people are taking Social Security retirement benefits in the year they turn 62. In 1985, 51.9% of men and 63.6% of women who turned 62 claimed Social Security retirement benefits. In 1996, those numbers slipped to 56% of men and 62.8% of women. But by 2013, both numbers declined sharply: 35.6% of men and 39.5% of women celebrated their 62nd birthday and claimed Social Security in that year. WHY WAIT? Author and CRR director Alicia Munnell pointed out that there are a variety of reasons for the shift in claiming trends. For instance, there's the increases in full retirement age to 66 from 65, effective for people born between 1943 and 1954, which gradually rises to 67 for those born in 1960 or later. Ms. Munnell also mentioned the shift from defined benefit plans to defined contribution plans as a reason why people are waiting longer to retire. “Defined benefit plans have incentives to encourage people to retire earlier,” she said. “There's a point at which the [DB] plan will pay full benefits under the full retirement age under the plan, and the benefits aren't any higher if you wait past that age.” Reduced availability of retiree health care is another motivating factor to keep people at their desks for a few more years. “We've had rapidly rising health care costs, and a decline in retiree health insurance, which makes waiting for Medicare all the more attractive,” Ms. Munnell said.
Percentage of people claiming Social Security benefits
the year they turned 62

Source: Boston College

WHEN TO CLAIM Claiming behavior will differ based on individual circumstances: An employee who participates in physically demanding labor may be reluctant or unable to keep doing that work until full retirement age. But financial advisers are saying that more of their clients are asking about when might be the best time to start claiming benefits, and increasingly, the best answer is to wait. Those who hold off until full retirement age receive full benefits, and those who wait until age 70 receive an 8% boost in income for each year they defer after full retirement age. Meanwhile, improper timing for claiming Social Security can be a costly error for clients, as Crain's Wealth columnist Mary Beth Franklin explains in a recent post. When clients ask Stephen Lovell, an adviser with Lovell Wealth Legacy, he has a question for them in response: “Do you think you're lucky?” “If so, and you live longer than the life expectancy, then if you claim later you get more in net present value dollars,” Mr. Lovell said. “If someone said, 'I don't know what to do,' then [I] tell them to wait. You're insuring against the unknown.” Individuals who are married typically also want to wait because of the claiming strategies available to them. “There are other factors that come into play, and then it's highly advantageous, usually, for the spouse with the higher salary to wait until 70,” Mr. Lovell said. At the very least, the shift in claiming trends suggests that many workers are getting the message about the benefits of waiting. “We're always exhorting people to work longer and claim later,” Ms. Munnell said. “It seems like people are doing that. It's nice to see that progress.”

Latest News

SEC to lose Hester Peirce, deepening a commissioner crisis
SEC to lose Hester Peirce, deepening a commissioner crisis

The "Crypto Mom" departure would leave the SEC commission with just two members and no Democratic commissioners on the panel.

Florida B-D, RIA owner pitches bold long-term plan to sell to advisors
Florida B-D, RIA owner pitches bold long-term plan to sell to advisors

IFP Securities’ owner, Bill Hamm, has a long-term plan for the firm and its 279 financial advisors.

Fintech bytes: Vanilla, Wealth.com forge new estate planning partnerships
Fintech bytes: Vanilla, Wealth.com forge new estate planning partnerships

Meanwhile, a Osaic and Envestnet ink a new adaptive wealthtech partnership to better support the firm's 10,000-plus advisors, and RIA-focused VastAdvisor unveils native integrations with leading CRMs.

Fiduciary failure: Ex-advisor who sold practice fined after clients lost millions
Fiduciary failure: Ex-advisor who sold practice fined after clients lost millions

A former Alabama investment advisor and ex-Kestra rep has been permanently barred and penalized after clients he promised to protect got caught in a $2.6 million fraud.

Why the evolution of ETFs is changing the due diligence equation
Why the evolution of ETFs is changing the due diligence equation

As more active strategies get packaged into the ETF wrapper, advisors and investors have to look beyond expense ratios as the benchmark for value.

SPONSORED Are hedge funds the missing ingredient?

Wellington explores how multi strategy hedge funds may enhance diversification

SPONSORED Beyond wealth management: Why the future of advice is becoming more human

As technical expertise becomes increasingly commoditized, advisors who can integrate strategy, relationships, and specialized expertise into a cohesive client experience will define the next era of wealth management