Why postponing Social Security benefits makes more sense now

AUG 21, 2014
Do you ever wonder why so many people are talking about the value of delaying Social Security benefits? It's pretty simple to understand the appeal of earning a guaranteed 8% per year for every year you postpone collecting Social Security beyond your full retirement age up to age 70. If your full retirement age is 66, delaying Social Security until 70 translates into a 32% bump in retirement benefits, which will create a larger base amount for future annual cost-of-living adjustments. See: 10 Ways To Maximize Social Security Benefits If you were born in 1960 or later, your full retirement age is 67. Consequently, you can earn only three years of delayed retirement credits, boosting your benefits to 124% of your full retirement age amount. But why does everyone seem to be talking about it now? It's because the delayed retirement credits weren't always so rich. And the current 8%-per-year delayed retirement credit kicked in about the same time the stock market hit its lowest point in 2009. Interest rates on short-term savings vehicles fell and have been bumping around near record lows ever since. (Don't miss: An unexpected death brings Social Security questions) First, a little history lesson. GRADUAL INCREASE As part of the sweeping Social Security Amendments of 1983, Congress decided to gradually increase the full retirement age from 65 and to increase the delayed retirement credits for those who delay collecting benefits beyond their full retirement age up to age 70. Before that, a provision allowing for a 1% credit a year for delaying retirement past age 65, up to age 72, was first enacted as part of the 1972 amendments. It was increased to 3% a year in the 1977 amendments. The 1983 amendments phased in an increase in the percentage, based on a person's date of birth, and lowered the age at which the increase no longer applied to age 70. Gradually, the annual delayed retirement credits were increased by half a percentage point every fewer years until it reached today's maximum limit of 8% per year. The 8% delayed retirement credit applies to anyone born in 1943 or later, which also corresponds to the first birth cohort (1943-1954) whose full retirement age is 66. Consequently, the first time workers could begin racking up 8% per year in delayed retirement credits was in 2009, when those born in 1943 reached their full retirement age of 66. The stock market hit its lowest point of the Great Recession in March 2009, and short-term interest rates on savings have been below 1% ever since. So it's easy to understand why it was more common in the past for people to collect Social Security benefits as soon as they could at age 62, particularly if they had stopped working and had a pension. There was little incentive to delay collecting benefits. And even if they didn't need the money to replace earnings, they probably could save or invest their retirement benefits and earn some decent returns. SAFETY NET Then the Great Recession happened. Many older workers lost their jobs and Social Security became a safety net for many. But for those who could hold on, working longer and postponing benefits became more attractive, particularly when they knew that every year they delayed collecting beyond their full retirement age of 66 would increase their benefits by 8% per year up until age 70 when the delayed retirement credits end. Where else could they find a risk-free, guaranteed rate of return of 8% per year? That same situation persists today. The 8% per year delayed retirement credit is hard to beat. But of course, postponing benefits assumes you'll be around long enough to collect the higher monthly payments and offset all the years of smaller benefits that you forfeited. How do you replace your income in the years you delay. Continued work? Short-term bridge annuity? Drawing down a 401(k) or IRA? There are lots of options. A financial planner or adviser might help. (Questions about Social Security? Find the answers in my new e-book.)

Latest News

Texas man says SEC and fund could make him pay twice
Texas man says SEC and fund could make him pay twice

A $141M judgment and a federal asset freeze collide over one shrinking pool

Osaic executives Kristy Britt and Greg Cornick to leave
Osaic executives Kristy Britt and Greg Cornick to leave

The firm's CFO and EVP of Wealth Management Solutions are the latest executives to exit the broker-dealer.

Estate planning becomes a client retention issue for financial advisors, survey finds
Estate planning becomes a client retention issue for financial advisors, survey finds

Clients are saying they would consider switching advisors if another professional offered estate planning services, according to a new Trust & Will survey.

Candidly adds AI agents for Trump Accounts, workplace benefits
Candidly adds AI agents for Trump Accounts, workplace benefits

CEO Laurel Taylor says the fintech's composable AI stack helps workers optimize dollars across Trump Accounts, 529s, 401(k)s, and other employee benefits.

BMO adds three advisors in Dallas amid Y'all Street wealth boom
BMO adds three advisors in Dallas amid Y'all Street wealth boom

The bank has swiped three private banking veterans from BNY as the city climbs the ranks of America's fastest-growing wealth hubs.

SPONSORED Who builds the income when the pension disappears?

Dan Biagini of American Equity says the steady decline of pensions, longer lifespans and a reset in interest rates are rewriting how advisors build retirement income

SPONSORED Why direct indexing stopped being optional

Direct indexing is on pace to outgrow ETFs and mutual funds. Northern Trust's Ken Lassner explains why the advisors who get it wish they had started sooner.