Clients won't care if you don't

Surprise, surprise: 85% of full-service investment firms' clients have never heard of, nor do they understand, the difference between the suitability standard followed by brokers and the fiduciary standard followed by registered investment advisers, according to a J.D. Power & Associates survey
JUN 30, 2011
By  MFXFeeder
Surprise, surprise: 85% of full-service investment firms' clients have never heard of, nor do they understand, the difference between the suitability standard followed by brokers and the fiduciary standard followed by registered investment advisers, according to a J.D. Power & Associates survey. As a story last week in InvestmentNews noted, investors don't seem very concerned about the different standards. In fact, there seems to be a fair amount of confusion among investors over the meaning of “fiduciary standard.” Some 42% of respondents to the survey said the fact that their financial advisers adhere to fiduciary standards reduces their level of comfort. But why would they be concerned, and why would they not be confused, if no one has ever explained the difference between the two standards and explained what a fiduciary standard is? Most investors probably assume that their brokers or investment advisers are providing them with the best advice for their particular situation — that is, that they are receiving objective information, untainted by the self-interests of the person providing it. They might have reacted differently if they understood that brokers are required only to ensure that suggested investments are suitable for the clients and that the brokers can consider their own interests (e.g., the size of their commissions), while registered investment advisers must offer advice solely in the interests of the clients.

DOUBLE STANDARD?

It's not even clear whether Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., understands the implications of a fiduciary standard versus a suitability standard. While the Dodd-Frank financial reform law gave the Securities and Exchange Commission the authority to impose a fiduciary duty on broker-dealers that is “no less stringent” than that required of investment advisers, in a May 31 letter to SEC Chairman Mary Schapiro, he appeared to say the SEC should be careful not to foist the investment adviser standard onto brokers. Huh? A fiduciary standard for brokers should be “no less stringent” than the investment adviser standard but shouldn't be the same? This suggests some confusion in Mr. Frank's mind and implies that he would accept two different fiduciary standards. The low level of knowledge on the part of investors is not an excuse to allow the two different standards to continue. It is a reason to improve efforts to educate investors about the implications of the existing two standards and to consolidate them. When dealing with clients — particularly prospective clients — financial planners and investment advisers often fail to differentiate their roles and responsibilities. Even more, they fail to distinguish their business models from those of brokers. The resulting confusion on the part of investors has left them vulnerable to higher-than-necessary fees, unnecessary services, unsuitable investments and even fraud. The financial services industry should inform the amateur investor of the different roles played by financial planners, investment advisers, life insurance professionals and broker-dealers. Where confusion exists, there lies the opportunity for scoundrels to take advantage.

Latest News

Maryland bars advisor over charging excessive fees to clients
Maryland bars advisor over charging excessive fees to clients

Blue Anchor Capital Management and Pickett also purchased “highly aggressive and volatile” securities, according to the order.

Wave of SEC appointments signals regulatory shift with implications for financial advisors
Wave of SEC appointments signals regulatory shift with implications for financial advisors

Reshuffle provides strong indication of where the regulator's priorities now lie.

US insurers want to take a larger slice of the retirement market through the RIA channel
US insurers want to take a larger slice of the retirement market through the RIA channel

Goldman Sachs Asset Management report reveals sharpened focus on annuities.

Why DA Davidson's wealth vice chairman still follows his dad's investment advice
Why DA Davidson's wealth vice chairman still follows his dad's investment advice

Ahead of Father's Day, InvestmentNews speaks with Andrew Crowell.

401(k) participants seek advice, but few turn to financial advisors
401(k) participants seek advice, but few turn to financial advisors

Cerulli research finds nearly two-thirds of active retirement plan participants are unadvised, opening a potential engagement opportunity.

SPONSORED RILAs bring stability, growth during volatile markets

Barely a decade old, registered index-linked annuities have quickly surged in popularity, thanks to their unique blend of protection and growth potential—an appealing option for investors looking to chart a steadier course through today’s choppy market waters, says Myles Lambert, Brighthouse Financial.

SPONSORED Beyond the dashboard: Making wealth tech human

How intelliflo aims to solve advisors' top tech headaches—without sacrificing the personal touch clients crave