Genocide-free investing policy urged for Fidelity funds

Shareholders of 13 Fidelity funds will vote next week on a non-binding resolution that asks the funds' boards of trustees to establish a policy of so-called genocide-free investing.
JUL 09, 2009
By  Sue Asci
Shareholders of 13 Fidelity funds will vote next week on a non-binding resolution that asks the funds' boards of trustees to establish a policy of so-called genocide-free investing. The resolution asks the boards to “institute procedures to prevent holding investments in companies that, in the judgment of the board, substantially contribute to genocide or crimes against humanity.” The resolution is part of a campaign coordinated by the Boston-based shareholder activist group Investors Against Genocide. The group has targeted Boston-based Fidelity in the past on this issue and is challenging the firm now because some of its funds have holdings in PetroChina, a Beijing-based oil company that does business in Sudan, where the government is implicated in genocidal violence in the Darfur region. Last year, similar resolutions garnered support from 20% to 31% of shareholders in 21 Fidelity funds, said Eric Cohen, chairman of Investors Against Genocide. A majority vote is needed to pass the resolution. “I wouldn't be surprised if we had very similar results within those kinds of ranges,” he said. “Anything above high single digits is a very significant message.” Fidelity is opposed to the resolution. “Fidelity seems to have decided they are not going to change their mind,” Mr. Cohen said. “It is astounding that they would oppose it in the face of millions of customers being upset with them [in the last vote].” Fidelity has posted a statement on its website that reads: “We are sensitive to the ongoing tragedy occurring in Darfur, and like others in the world we are repulsed by genocide and all other crimes against humanity. When it is appropriate to remain actively invested in a company we will do so, thus retaining the ability to oppose company practices that we do not condone. This may be the most viable way to bring constructive influence on world issues.” Regarding any actions the firm has taken to engage problem companies, company spokesman Vin Loporchio said: “We communicate directly with companies and we don't generally comment on holdings or individual communications of that type.” Investors Against Genocide has encouraged shareholder action with other mutual fund firms as well. Just last week, however, shareholders of 21 funds at The Vanguard Group Inc. of Malvern, Pa. voted on a genocide resolution, with an average of 89% of shareholders voting against the proposal. Vanguard had adopted a procedure that requires “regular reporting on portfolio companies whose direct involvement in crimes against humanity or patterns of egregious abuses of human rights would warrant engagement or potential divestment.” The practice had been in place on an ad hoc basis and was formalized by the board of trustees, Vanguard reported in March. This spring, Investors Against Genocide withdrew its proposal from the proxy ballot for New York-based TIAA-CREF's shareholder meeting after the institution announced a strategy to engage companies involved with the government of Sudan.

Latest News

Judge OKs more than $90 million in settlement money for GWG investors
Judge OKs more than $90 million in settlement money for GWG investors

Mayer Brown, GWG's law firm, agreed to pay $30 million to resolve conflict of interest claims.

Fintech bytes: Orion and eMoney add new planning, investment tools for RIAs
Fintech bytes: Orion and eMoney add new planning, investment tools for RIAs

Orion adds new model portfolios and SMAs under expanded JPMorgan tie-up, while eMoney boosts its planning software capabilities.

Retirement uncertainty cuts across generations: Transamerica
Retirement uncertainty cuts across generations: Transamerica

National survey of workers exposes widespread retirement planning challenges for Gen Z, Millennials, Gen X, and Boomers.

Does a merger or acquisition make sense for your firm? Why now is the perfect time to secure your firm’s future
Does a merger or acquisition make sense for your firm? Why now is the perfect time to secure your firm’s future

While the choice for advisors to "die at their desks" might been wise once upon a time, higher acquisition multiples and innovations in deal structures have created more immediate M&A opportunities.

Raymond James continues recruitment run with UBS, Morgan Stanley teams
Raymond James continues recruitment run with UBS, Morgan Stanley teams

A father-son pair has joined the firm's independent arm in Utah, while a quartet of planning advisors strengthen its employee channel in Louisiana.

SPONSORED RILAs bring stability, growth during volatile markets

Barely a decade old, registered index-linked annuities have quickly surged in popularity, thanks to their unique blend of protection and growth potential—an appealing option for investors looking to chart a steadier course through today's choppy market waters, says Myles Lambert, Brighthouse Financial.

SPONSORED Beyond the dashboard: Making wealth tech human

How intelliflo aims to solve advisors' top tech headaches—without sacrificing the personal touch clients crave