Many pessimistic about financial future, study shows

WASHINGTON — As Americans feel more stressed out over the erosion of corporate benefits and the solvency of social benefits programs, such traditional economic indicators as gross domestic product growth and household income are becoming less correlated to their perception of the economy’s well-being, according to a recently released study.
FEB 05, 2007
WASHINGTON — As Americans feel more stressed out over the erosion of corporate benefits and the solvency of social benefits programs, such traditional economic indicators as gross domestic product growth and household income are becoming less correlated to their perception of the economy’s well-being, according to a recently released study. The “MetLife Study of the American Dreams,” which was based on interviews with more than 1,500 people in November, found that a majority of respondents said that there was more at risk with respect to their financial future than in the past. That was particularly true for the respondents who were baby boomers and Generation Xers. Seventy-two percent of those surveyed expressed concern that Social Security won’t be around in the future. Meanwhile, 53% expressed the same concern for Medicare. New York-based MetLife Inc.’s study also found that 60% of respondents said they carried more financial burdens than did their parents, and most thought that the burden would continue to grow with future generations. Only members of the so-called silent generation — those born during the Great Depression and World War II — felt they had it good compared with their parents. Sixty-one percent of those surveyed felt that the decline in company benefits was negatively affecting their ability to achieve financial security, according to the study. Although most of those surveyed said that they thought they could achieve financial security if they worked hard, only half said that they thought their hard work actually pays off, the study found. The study called for a range of actions, including encouraging individuals to work with financial advisers “who understand the burden shift,” as well as for employers to provide bridges to more effective self-sufficiency for their employees. — Sara Hansard

Latest News

Advisor moves: Merrill draws $1.2 billion UBS team in New Mexico
Advisor moves: Merrill draws $1.2 billion UBS team in New Mexico

Meanwhile, Raymond James, Wedbush, and LPL recruited veteran advisors from across Texas, North Carolina, and California.

Tax strategy belongs in the room: Why RIAs should treat tax as a firm-level growth issue
Tax strategy belongs in the room: Why RIAs should treat tax as a firm-level growth issue

Registering as an S corp, making an advisor partner, and acquiring another practice all carry tax implications that RIA owners should be ready to think through.

Arete Wealth adds investment banking division with industry veteran at the helm
Arete Wealth adds investment banking division with industry veteran at the helm

Chicago-based independent broker-dealer's new division will provide advisory and capital formation services.

Most finance firms have sent clients an AI-generated error
Most finance firms have sent clients an AI-generated error

Most financial services professionals believe flawed AI content has made it into client deliverables, yet guardrails remain scarce, a new report finds

Trump's $500 ACA checks: should advisors care?
Trump's $500 ACA checks: should advisors care?

The rebate is political theater, but the healthcare cost crisis underneath it is very much an advisor problem.

SPONSORED Direct indexing webinar targets tax-loss harvesting amid market swings

Northern Trust’s Ken Lassner shows advisors how to convert volatility into after-tax portfolio gains

SPONSORED Who builds the income when the pension disappears?

Dan Biagini of American Equity says the steady decline of pensions, longer lifespans and a reset in interest rates are rewriting how advisors build retirement income