Wall Street firms that help issue asset-backed securities wouldn’t be able to bet against those products under a plan from the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The SEC’s five commissioners on Wednesday voted unanimously to propose new conflicts-of-interest regulations for investment banks and others involved in securitizations. The new restrictions wouldn’t cover market making or trades to hedge against risk, according to the commission.
SEC Chair Gary Gensler called the measure an “unfinished step in Congress’s vision for financial reform” following the 2008 financial crisis. “It fulfills Congress’s mandate to address conflicts of interests in the securitization market,” he added.
The proposal would mostly prohibit firms involved in selling asset-backed securities from shorting that security, purchasing related credit default swaps, as well as other types of bets that could run counter to the interests of investors who bought the products.
The SEC first proposed a version of the rule in 2011, and more than a decade later it remains one of the few requirements under the Dodd-Frank Act that the agency hasn’t completed.
The most public example of the issues that the SEC plan seeks to address involved a transaction that Goldman Sachs Group Inc. put together in 2007, known as Abacus 2007-AC1. It was essentially a giant bet on a portfolio of subprime mortgage bonds. The deal was created at the request of hedge fund Paulson & Co., which wanted to wager that many of the bonds backing the transaction would sour.
Goldman Sachs found investors to essentially take the other side of that wager, without telling them that the securities had been selected by a hedge fund betting the bonds would fail. When details of the transactions went public, there was an immediate outcry.
The bank agreed to a $550 million settlement with the SEC over the case. Goldman didn’t admit or deny the allegations but said at the time that it had made a mistake by not including more disclosure. In the aftermath, it set up a business standards committee and took steps to separate its customer brokerage business more clearly from its own trading.
The SEC will now take comments from industry and the public for at least 30 days and will need to vote again to finalize the rule after taking into account that feedback for it to go into effect.
A new analysis finds long-running fiscal woes coupled with impacts from the One Big Beautiful Bill Act stand to erode the major pillar for retirement income planning.
Caz Craffy, whom the Department of Justice hit with a 12-year prison term last year for defrauding grieving military families, has been officially exiled from the securities agency.
After years or decades spent building deep relationships with clients, experienced advisors' attention and intention must turn toward their spouses, children, and future generations.
The customer’s UBS financial advisor allegedly mishandled an options strategy called a collar, according to the client’s attorney.
An expansion to a 2017 TCJA provision, a permanent increase to the standard deduction, and additional incentives for non-itemizers add new twists to the donate-or-wait decision.
Orion's Tom Wilson on delivering coordinated, high-touch service in a world where returns alone no longer set you apart.
Barely a decade old, registered index-linked annuities have quickly surged in popularity, thanks to their unique blend of protection and growth potential—an appealing option for investors looking to chart a steadier course through today's choppy market waters, says Myles Lambert, Brighthouse Financial.
