Tax exclusion cap hard to administer, says EBRI

For many employers, especially self-insured employers, administering a cap on the tax exclusion for employer-based health coverage would be difficult, according to a detailed study.
JAN 15, 2009
By  Bloomberg
For many employers, especially self-insured employers, administering a cap on the tax exclusion for employer-based health coverage would be difficult, according to a detailed study published yesterday by the Employee Benefit Research Institute in Washington. In 2005, a presidential advisory board recommended a cap on the amount of coverage individuals could exclude from their income tax as a way to reduce health spending. Under the advisory board’s proposal, workers with coverage valued above the cap would pay taxes on the amount over the cap. Workers could choose a less costly health plan to avoid the tax on premiums above the cap. Changing the tax treatment of employment-based health coverage has been discussed as far back as President Reagan’s administration, and it came up often in the recent presidential campaign. Currently, payments made by employers for their employee’s health insurance generally are excluded from workers’ taxable income, and many workers pay out-of-pocket expenses with pretax dollars from flexible spending accounts. Capping the exclusion would result in wide variations among employers based on the type of health plan benefit, the size and demographics of their work force and where workers lived, the study found. About one-half of employees in firms that offer health coverage work for employers that offer only one plan. For self-insured employers, who pay health care claims directly and who employ 45% of workers, a cap would be especially difficult to administer, because employers would have to arrive at a “premium equivalent” for each worker. That would be costly for employers and could create fairness and tax issues for many workers, the study concluded.

Latest News

Advisor headcount down at Bank of America, Osaic and UBS so far in 2025, Wolfe Research analyst says
Advisor headcount down at Bank of America, Osaic and UBS so far in 2025, Wolfe Research analyst says

Counting advisor moves in and out of firms requires some art as well as science.

Carson Group's M&A head sees '10-to-15 year bull market' for RIAs
Carson Group's M&A head sees '10-to-15 year bull market' for RIAs

“I'm just a big believer that based on demographics alone, we are looking at a 10-to-15 year bull market in M&A in the RIA and independent wealth space,” said Michael Belluomini, SVP of M&A at Carson Group.

Nationwide finds Medicare myth on long-term care could cost Americans dearly
Nationwide finds Medicare myth on long-term care could cost Americans dearly

As a tsunami of retirees comes crashing in, three-fifths of those surveyed believe – wrongly – that the federal safety net will cover their LTC needs.

Fintech bytes: Orion, Altruist unveil new RIA-focused integrations
Fintech bytes: Orion, Altruist unveil new RIA-focused integrations

Orion's latest update, a partnership with 11th.com, focuses on an underserved area of compliance for advisors and wealth firms.

Raymond James reels in advisors managing $1B+ in Colorado
Raymond James reels in advisors managing $1B+ in Colorado

The latest arrivals, including a 10-advisor ensemble from Ameriprise, bolster the firm's independent contractor and employee advisor channels.

SPONSORED RILAs bring stability, growth during volatile markets

Barely a decade old, registered index-linked annuities have quickly surged in popularity, thanks to their unique blend of protection and growth potential—an appealing option for investors looking to chart a steadier course through today's choppy market waters, says Myles Lambert, Brighthouse Financial.

SPONSORED Beyond the dashboard: Making wealth tech human

How intelliflo aims to solve advisors' top tech headaches—without sacrificing the personal touch clients crave