Tax tips: Greater returns and asset consolidation

Tax tips: Greater returns and asset consolidation
It's that time of year when you are talking to clients about taxes.
NOV 28, 2010
By  Bloomberg
It's that time of year when you are talking to clients about taxes. And if you are like the advisors we talk to, those discussions center around how to minimize taxes in this year by harvesting losses now. And while the conversation likely centers around individual accounts you manage, you could do an even better job for your clients – and your practice – if you manage taxes with the full household in mind. Managing client assets at the household level lets you significantly reduce taxes by locating assets in the most advantageous type of taxable or tax-qualified accounts. By reducing the taxes paid, the end result is decidedly better after-tax returns, more income in retirement and/or a greater remaining or bequest value. In fact, Ernst & Young conducted research and found this kind of approach can generate as much as 33% better results for investors. And because the client benefits by taking a more holistic view of the household, advisors report that it provides an additional, compelling reason to consolidate assets with you. Although taxes are generally realized only in a client's taxable accounts, an advisor can reduce a client's taxes by hiding high tax-drag assets in tax-deferred and tax-free accounts and optimally managing the income and capital gains on assets in the taxable accounts. And by managing a client's multiple accounts together, you can maintain both target asset allocations and optimal locations of assets. Estimating Tax Drag for Different Assets The federal tax code treats income from three main categories of investment assets differently: 1) income from taxable bonds is taxed as ordinary income; 2) qualified stock dividends are taxed at capital gains rates; and 3) income from municipal bonds is not taxed. And, capital gains are taxed at either a short term (income tax) rate or a lower long-term level. For simplicity, we will address high tax bracket retirees using a 33% ordinary income tax rate and 15% capital gains rate while taking a view of a 35-year retirement period. And, we make the following assumptions: • Taxable bonds have a 4% yield, no expected appreciation, and an after-tax yield of 2.7%. • Stocks have a 2% dividend, 6% appreciation and after-tax income, and annual appreciation of 5.7% and short term capital gains realization for high turnover stocks and 7.4% annual appreciation for stocks subject to optimal tax management. • Because returns for bonds, high turnover stocks and optimally-managed stocks are not what deliver retirement income, we calculate the average pretax and after-tax retirement income yields for each asset. o Taxable bonds have pretax and after-tax retirement income yields of 5.4% and 4.4%. o Stocks have pretax retirement yield of 8.6%. o High turnover and tax-managed stocks have after-tax yields of 6.7% and 8.1%. These yields (especially the after-tax yields) are higher than the annual returns because retirement income depends on investment returns and return of principal. Optimal Location Increases Returns and Retirement Income: Three Examples We apply these returns and yields to each of three high-tax bracket households. In each we assume the households have 50% of their assets in taxable accounts and 50% in tax-qualified accounts. Example #1: The advisor allocates half the assets to bonds and half to high turnover stocks. Because the tax-drag is higher for stocks (1.9% equal to pretax yield of 8.6% minus after-tax yield 6.7%) than for the bonds (1% equal to pretax yield of 5.4% minus after-tax yield 4.4%), the stocks should be located in the tax-qualified account and the bonds should be located in the taxable account. By optimally locating the assets in this way, retirement income increases by 8.2% and retirement yield by 0.5%. Example #2: The advisor allocates half the assets to bonds and half to tax-managed stocks. The tax drag is now lower for stocks (0.5% equal to pretax yield of 8.6% minus after-tax yield 8.1%) than for the bonds (still 1%), so the stocks should instead be located in the taxable account and the bonds in the tax-free account. Now with optimal asset location, retirement income and retirement income yield increase by 3.1% and 0.2%, respectively. Example #3: The advisor has an aggressive client and allocates 50% to high turnover stocks and 50% to tax-managed stocks. Locating the high turnover stocks in the tax-free accounts and the tax-managed stocks in the taxable account increases retirement income by 9.1% and retirement income yield by 0.7%. Paul Samuelson, PhD, is the Chief Investment Officer of LifeYield, LLC, which develops advisor software solutions to generate tax-smart returns and income.

Latest News

JPMorgan mulls new asset lending scheme aimed at crypto ETF investors
JPMorgan mulls new asset lending scheme aimed at crypto ETF investors

Insiders say the Wall Street giant is looking to let clients count certain crypto holdings as collateral or, in some cases, assets in their overall net worth.

Fintech bytes: Future Capital adds RayJay alum to C-suite, Advyzon welcomes ex-Envestnet leader
Fintech bytes: Future Capital adds RayJay alum to C-suite, Advyzon welcomes ex-Envestnet leader

The two wealth tech firms are bolstering their leadership as they take differing paths towards growth and improved advisor services.

UBS 'wrongfully' fired Idaho advisor in 2021: FINRA panel
UBS 'wrongfully' fired Idaho advisor in 2021: FINRA panel

“We think this happened because of Anderson’s age and that he was possibly leaving,” said the advisor’s attorney.

Cetera Trust hires Fidelity vet Kerri Scharr for chief fiduciary officer role
Cetera Trust hires Fidelity vet Kerri Scharr for chief fiduciary officer role

The newly appointed leader will be responsible for overseeing fiduciary governance, regulatory compliance, and risk management at Cetera's trust services company.

Trump's 'revenge tax' might come back to bite US borrowers, experts say
Trump's 'revenge tax' might come back to bite US borrowers, experts say

Certain foreign banking agreements could force borrowers to absorb Section 899's potential impact, putting some lending relationships at risk.

SPONSORED Beyond the dashboard: Making wealth tech human

How intelliflo aims to solve advisors' top tech headaches—without sacrificing the personal touch clients crave

SPONSORED The evolution of private credit

From direct lending to asset-based finance to commercial real estate debt.