The greatest risk to RIAs that's not in their portfolios

The greatest risk to RIAs that's not in their portfolios
Here are some of the most critical and potentially damaging misconceptions held by compliance professionals.
JUN 28, 2016
Registered investment advisers face stringent regulations to make sure they are not engaging in risky behavior such as conflicts of interest, cybersecurity and other governance, risk and compliance issues. And it is getting worse. The Securities and Exchange Commission is planning to increase the number of RIA examiners by 20% in 2016 in a bid to create more oversight for the rapidly growing industry. Within the next 10 years, 8,500 SEC-registered advisers with $24 trillion in assets under management are projected to grow to 12,000 advisers with $65 trillion in AUM in fiscal 2016, according to the SEC. That is a lot of people to ensure are acting compliant and in the best interests of their clients. With these increasing numbers, RIAs need to make sure that they are managing their riskiest asset: their people. There are many misconceptions regarding the issue of people risk management for RIAs. Here are some of the most critical and potentially damaging misconceptions held by compliance professionals – the kind of denials that say, “It's okay if we do nothing.” 1. “We cover the bases by registering our people and monitoring business transactions.” The news is full of cases where other companies thought the same thing. In 2015, the SEC filed 807 enforcement actions against firms, citing violations concerning everything from insider trading, faulty allocations and conflicts of interest to the firms' failure to “commit the time, attention and resources to a range of critical obligations in the supervision of registered reps.” That covers a lot of territory, and all of it can be treacherous. 2. “We thoroughly vet our people in our recruiting and hiring processes.” It's been shown that roughly 50% of applicants have lied on their resumes. Furthermore, it's not always possible to reliably predict a person's behavior when the individual is faced with stress, temptation and opportunities for ill-gotten gain or innocent human error. 3. “We haven't had any audit exceptions or regulatory compliance issues to date, so we have every reason to believe our risk management practices are working.” No news is not necessarily good news; compliance does not always equal risk management; and the fact that risk has gone undetected does not mean it doesn't exist. Too many firms realized these truths too late. The SEC has promised to assert its presence in emerging areas of first impression and is using new, advanced technologies in its pursuit of rules violations. They're working. 4. “Our company is relatively small. The smaller the organization the smaller the potential risk.” Unfortunately, size is no indicator of safety, as size can scale management resources not potential risk problems scale much greater. Actually, organizations with fewer employees may face a larger preponderance of risk, since the people are likely to wear many different hats. This can dilute attention to risk management and increase the potential that critical indications of risk are being widely overlooked. 5. “People risk management is a compliance officer's or human resources professional's responsibility.” False. Regulators consider compliance to be an enterprise-wide endeavor, the responsibility for which extends from the board level to each individual employee. In other words, it's everybody's job. RIAs face a heavy price for non-compliance and are required to develop a code of ethics, in addition to maintaining books and records of activities. With scrutiny coming so heavily from the SEC, and the potential of third-party examiners looming, RIAs need to protect themselves with an arsenal of tools. Maintaining an automated compliance program is essential to keeping track of employee activity. As complexity in compliance for RIAs is continuing to explode, firms should rely on technology to monitor trades and potentially illicit behavior. Employees' risky behavior and non-compliant conduct can result in devastating consequences on both a corporate and personal level. Make sure you don't fall victim. Charles Steerman is vice president at Compliance Science.

Latest News

JPMorgan mulls new asset lending scheme aimed at crypto ETF investors
JPMorgan mulls new asset lending scheme aimed at crypto ETF investors

Insiders say the Wall Street giant is looking to let clients count certain crypto holdings as collateral or, in some cases, assets in their overall net worth.

Fintech bytes: Future Capital adds RayJay alum to C-suite, Advyzon welcomes ex-Envestnet leader
Fintech bytes: Future Capital adds RayJay alum to C-suite, Advyzon welcomes ex-Envestnet leader

The two wealth tech firms are bolstering their leadership as they take differing paths towards growth and improved advisor services.

UBS 'wrongfully' fired Idaho advisor in 2021: FINRA panel
UBS 'wrongfully' fired Idaho advisor in 2021: FINRA panel

“We think this happened because of Anderson’s age and that he was possibly leaving,” said the advisor’s attorney.

Cetera Trust hires Fidelity vet Kerri Scharr for chief fiduciary officer role
Cetera Trust hires Fidelity vet Kerri Scharr for chief fiduciary officer role

The newly appointed leader will be responsible for overseeing fiduciary governance, regulatory compliance, and risk management at Cetera's trust services company.

Trump's 'revenge tax' might come back to bite US borrowers, experts say
Trump's 'revenge tax' might come back to bite US borrowers, experts say

Certain foreign banking agreements could force borrowers to absorb Section 899's potential impact, putting some lending relationships at risk.

SPONSORED Beyond the dashboard: Making wealth tech human

How intelliflo aims to solve advisors' top tech headaches—without sacrificing the personal touch clients crave

SPONSORED The evolution of private credit

From direct lending to asset-based finance to commercial real estate debt.