Why traditional economic indicators failed so many this cycle

Many economists believe a recession is still a possibility, which has been stoked by the breakdown in traditionally reliable indicators.
SEP 19, 2016
Many economists hold the belief that a recession is still a possibility, which has been stoked by the breakdown in traditionally reliable economic indicators. These include economist favorites like the Industrial Production Index (IPI), the Baltic Dry Index (BDIY), the Change in Labor Market Conditions Index (LMCI) and the price of copper. But are these long standing indicators really accurate? Consider that we are multi-years into the dollar's rise and still, many economy watchers seemingly can't rework their models to interpret data for the extraordinarily strong U.S. currency and the effects it's having on global interactions and prices. We believe that indicators like the BDIY and copper have been rendered completely useless by the effects of the dollar, the oversupply of product and the current en vogue switch to service based economies across the world. The two most obvious examples of this significant shift are China and Saudi Arabia. Each of these countries' governments has realized the need and benefit of growing their impoverished middle class through the services sector instead of the highly volatile commodity and manufacturing sectors. And both countries have now begun the difficult and painful process by moving sovereign investments away from these areas, which only adds to the harm already being created by the dollar on the effectiveness of indicators that capture almost exclusively commodity related growth. Further, the IPI, which is the stalwart indicator for many economists, has been flashing bright red recession lights for months now. But unfortunately, this index is also disproportionately set towards industries that continue to be in great depression level downturns, yet represent little in the way of the makeup of our current service based economies. And its reliability is further compromised by a shifting and more efficient power grid and the prevalence of utility output as a component. In contrast, we think that the Chemical Activity Barometer, which was developed by the American Chemistry Council, to now be a far superior leading indicator to industrial production. It grabs items with more pertinent data for the makeup of the economy we now find ourselves in today. The “CAB” has been found to consistently lead the U.S. economy's business cycle given its early position in the supply chain versus a large metal and mining focus in the Industrial Production numbers. The CAB has been showing strong year-over-year growth and has been accelerating in the past few months. This is a very good sign for an eventual pickup in the more lagging IPI number. Finally, we come to the recently ugly looking LMCI which is a Fed favorite used to gauge the health of the jobs market. Over the past few months this index has been trending down and worrying many market participants, as well as the Fed. There are plenty of explanations for this. First, the working-age population is growing very slowly now that the two largest generations, Millennials and Baby Boomers, are very solidly already in the number. Second, the labor force participation rate will have a hard time growing substantially until lower income wages increase enough to get people excited about working again. That's why we think the trajectory of payroll employment will continue higher at a steady, although slower, pace with 100k plus months being the exception and not the norm. The bright spot in the employment picture continues to be wage growth, which for the last several years seem to focus on the very skilled higher paying jobs, but is now proliferating down to the lower income works. These higher wages for lower income workers, accompanied by minimum wage increases, could not only put more money in workers' pockets, but also help the labor force participation rate as well. The economic table as it is currently set, shows a lower growth, but incredibly stable environment, but only if you interpret the data with the strong dollar in mind. Brett F. Ewing is chief market strategist and S. Lance Mitchell is research director with First Franklin Financial Services

Latest News

401(k) savings rate at new record high but balances are down slightly
401(k) savings rate at new record high but balances are down slightly

Quarterly analysis of retirement accounts highlights positive behavior.

JPMorgan mulls new asset lending scheme aimed at crypto ETF investors
JPMorgan mulls new asset lending scheme aimed at crypto ETF investors

Insiders say the Wall Street giant is looking to let clients count certain crypto holdings as collateral or, in some cases, assets in their overall net worth.

Fintech bytes: Future Capital adds RayJay alum to C-suite, Advyzon welcomes ex-Envestnet leader
Fintech bytes: Future Capital adds RayJay alum to C-suite, Advyzon welcomes ex-Envestnet leader

The two wealth tech firms are bolstering their leadership as they take differing paths towards growth and improved advisor services.

UBS 'wrongfully' fired Idaho advisor in 2021: FINRA panel
UBS 'wrongfully' fired Idaho advisor in 2021: FINRA panel

“We think this happened because of Anderson’s age and that he was possibly leaving,” said the advisor’s attorney.

Cetera Trust hires Fidelity vet Kerri Scharr for chief fiduciary officer role
Cetera Trust hires Fidelity vet Kerri Scharr for chief fiduciary officer role

The newly appointed leader will be responsible for overseeing fiduciary governance, regulatory compliance, and risk management at Cetera's trust services company.

SPONSORED Beyond the dashboard: Making wealth tech human

How intelliflo aims to solve advisors' top tech headaches—without sacrificing the personal touch clients crave

SPONSORED The evolution of private credit

From direct lending to asset-based finance to commercial real estate debt.