What does a Goldman-owned United Capital mean for advisers?

What does a Goldman-owned United Capital mean for advisers?
Purchase is most obviously a fit for Goldman's strategic vision.
MAY 14, 2019

Joe Duran's long-rumored search for additional investment in United Capital Financial Partners seems to be concluding with a sale to Goldman Sachs Group. There are still a lot of questions surrounding the deal's specifics and what it means for United Capital advisers and the third-party firms using the FinLife Partner technology suite, but it's very easy to see how this purchase makes sense for Goldman. [More: Joe Duran has a game plan, and anyone can play] Before getting into why, it should be noted that neither company has officially confirmed the acquisition is happening. Neither has responded to a request for comment, and other outlets have reported the deal isn't complete and could still fall apart. But on paper, the move fits nicely alongside several other Goldman has made to grow its footprint in the retail investor market. Though the company has a private bank, Goldman made its name as an investment bank and asset manager for large institutions. The firm laid out a plan in July to bring in $5 billion in new revenue over three years, with new clients in its investment management division driving growth. Goldman has acquired a couple of personal finance apps and in May shifted Marcus, its online bank offering high-yield savings accounts and personal loans, to the investment management side. Consumers can open a Marcus bank account with as little as $5,000. By combining Marcus with United Capital, Goldman can give Marcus clients access to financial planning and advice while offering United Capital clients access to high-yield savings, an increasingly popular feature among robo-advisers and traditional RIAs. (More:Carson Group advisers will soon be able to offer clients banking accounts) With one acquisition, Goldman goes from having a nearly nonexistent presence among mass affluent investors to being a major provider, all without having to open any branch offices. Don't forget, it is also the bank behind Apple's new credit card. "Goldman has positioned themselves BEAUTIFULLY for the future of financial services all while maintaining their brand with UHNW," SS&C Advent strategist Kyle Van Pelt said on Twitter. Mr. Van Pelt also pointed out Goldman's recent acquisition of Standard & Poor's Investment Advisory Services to help package together Goldman funds into model strategies. United Capital's technology can help bring new mass affluent customers onto the models. Any of the $25 billion in assets managed by United Capital's RIA, United Capital Financial Advisors, that moves over to those models is just icing on the cake, Mr. Van Pelt said. What remains to be seen is how United Capital's human financial advisers react to the acquisition. Will Goldman force them into the wirehouse brokerage model? How hard will Goldman push its proprietary products on advisers accustomed to acting as independent fiduciaries, or influence service models? It's possible Goldman tries to make everyone at United Capital a W2 employee, but the market that United Capital serves is a brand new one for Goldman. If the company wants to grow that segment, it makes sense for United Capital to continue to operate as is. Goldman could give advisers access to its own funds and models without mandating advisers to implement them. United Capital's existing revenue stream takes some of that pressure off. "It could absolutely be that Goldman is going to use this scale of an acquisition to transplant fiduciary capabilities and DNA into their organization," said Riskalyze CEO Aaron Klein. "My prediction is they don't brand it Goldman wealth management. Do they keep the United Capital name? Or meld it with Marcus?" The worst news could be for third-party RIAs using the FinLife Partners technology platform. The company boasts $25 billion in assets under contract on FinLife Partners, but it's unclear how much revenue that generates for United Capital. If United Capital charges 25 basis points on every dollar, it would bring in just $62.5 million. Not bad, but probably not a driving force of the deal. Goldman could decide there is more value in cutting off third-party partnerships and making FinLife technology a proprietary product.

Latest News

Retirement conundrum: crippling health care costs or start dumping assets?
Retirement conundrum: crippling health care costs or start dumping assets?

Investors fearing unaffordable healthcare may spend-down assets, study reveals.

Income growth, market performance keeps middle-class wealth on track
Income growth, market performance keeps middle-class wealth on track

Quarterly financial resilience index shows easing fears.

Stocks pause near record high amid tech decline
Stocks pause near record high amid tech decline

Near-term volatility to be expected, says UBS.

Trump dominates Davos without even being there
Trump dominates Davos without even being there

World leaders, finance chiefs try to assess impact on global economy.

Why stubbornly high US Treasury yields are bad news for EMs
Why stubbornly high US Treasury yields are bad news for EMs

Investors less likely to take the risk when US notes offer such good odds.

SPONSORED Three key trends that will drive advisors’ planning in 2025

AssetMark Group CEO explains why the great wealth transfer, succession planning, and personalization will be key for advisors in the new year.

SPONSORED Why RIAs might consider investing more in trust services

A trust delivery model not only increases the value of an advisor and a firm but is also a natural addition to any firm’s succession plan.