Subscribe

SEC official pushes back against criticism of share-class crackdown

RIAs should know better than not to disclose 12b-1 fees, says Enforcement co-director Peikin.

A Securities and Exchange Commission official said Wednesday he doesn’t understand why the agency is catching flak from some in the financial industry over its crackdown on inadequate disclosure of mutual fund fees.

For more than a year, the SEC has been conducting an enforcement program focused on investment advisers who do not properly disclose recommending high-cost share classes — those that pay them 12b-1 and other fees — when less expensive classes of the same fund are available.

Critics said the SEC launched the share-class initiative without explaining to firms the disclosure rubric. They assert that the SEC changed its expectations without providing a chance for public comment — in other words, the SEC was engaging in rule-making by enforcement.

But Steven Peikin, co-director of the SEC Enforcement Division, said the industry should have known from previous enforcement cases as well as the fiduciary requirements for advisers that not disclosing 12b-1 fees was a violation.

“I’m a little bit perplexed by some of the criticism,” Mr. Peikin said at the Securities Enforcement Forum in Washington. “I don’t feel like you need the SEC to tell you that as a fiduciary that’s something you shouldn’t be doing.”

[Recommended video: Identifying adviser rollover opportunities]

Mr. Peikin used a nearby prop to illustrate his point. “If I find out my investment adviser is selling me this bottle of water for more than I had to pay for it because she was getting a return on that additional fee, I’d find a new investment adviser,” he said.

He then clarified that the SEC’s focus is on whether advisers tell their clients about the fees.

“The issue is the disclosure of that conflict of interest,” he said.

In the share-class initiative, it was generally a broker affiliate of an advisory firm that was receiving the 12b-1 fees.

Last week, the SEC released a set of frequently asked questions that outline adviser conflicts of interest related to compensation and how they can address them.

As part of the share-class initiative, the SEC provided incentives to self-report and has reached settlements with 96 firms. Recently Peter Driscoll, director of the SEC Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations, said the agency is still seeing share-class problems on exams.

Related Topics:

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

Wealth firms must prepare for demise of non-competes, despite legal challenges to FTC rule

A growing sentiment against restricting employee moves could affect non-solicitation, too.

FPA, CFP Board diverge on DOL investment advice proposal

While the CFP Board supports the proposal, the FPA has expressed concerns about the DOL rule potentially raising compliance costs for members, increasing the cost of advice and reducing access to advice for some.

Braxton encourages RIAs to see investing in diversity as a business strategy

‘If a firm values its human capital, then it will make an investment to make sure that their talent can flourish for the advancement of the bottom line,’ says Lazetta Rainey Braxton, co-CEO of 2050 Wealth Partners.

Bill chips away at SALT block but comes with drawbacks, advisors say

'I’d love to see the [full] SALT deduction come back but not if it means rates go up,' one advisor says.

Former Morgan Stanley broker running for office reviewing $147K award

Deborah Adeimy claimed firm blocked her from running in GOP primary, aide says 'we're unclear how award figure was calculated.'

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print