Subscribe

SEC should accelerate its late leap to electronic delivery

SEC-should-speed-edelivery Close up view of an office desk.

The agency could do more to make e-delivery the default option for shareholder communications, while preserving shareholders’ right to request printed material

As most of us are shifting to e-everything (work, school, food delivery, medical check-ups, even happy hours) to adapt to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Department of Labor is expected to release a rule soon that as proposed recognizes and maximizes the advantages of electronic modes of communication for retirement plan information. It is both a timely rule change, and one that is long overdue.  

The rule is expected to give plan fiduciaries flexibility to establish electronic delivery as the default method for communicating with and delivering plan information to their 401(k) or similar plan participants.

The benefits of e-delivery have been well documented. Disclosure can be available on demand, interactive, current and easier to navigate. Reducing paper use helps the environment. The visually impaired and savers whose first language is not English can benefit from features of digital communications, including translation options. And for those who want paper delivery, the ability to opt in at any point assures continued access.

The federal government recognizes these advantages. For years it has been using e-delivery for its most important communications with citizens. Since 2015, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services has encouraged Medicare recipients to receive Electronic Medicare Summary Notices. The Social Security Administration and the Federal Employees Retirement System, the 401(k) administrator for federal workers, both extensively use e-delivery for communicating participant and beneficiary information. Indeed, the Treasury Department in effect used e-delivery to deposit billions of dollars of payments to taxpayers’ accounts pursuant to the CARES Act.

As we look forward to the finalization of the DOL rule for retirement plan participants and beneficiaries, now that it was approved by the Office of Management and Budget this week, it invites the question: Why has the Securities and Exchange Commission not more quickly allowed all mutual fund investors the ability to reap the benefits of cost savings and easy, immediate access?

Switching to e-delivery over printed materials has stymied the SEC for years. The agency certainly deserves credit for adopting the “notice and access” rule that finally allows funds to mail a notification postcard to fund shareholders about the electronic availability of annual and semi-annual shareholder reports and then make those reports available online. However, due to a prolonged compliance date — it will not go into effect until 2021, 2½ years after its adoption — this option is not yet available.

The commission could do more to make e-delivery the default option for shareholder communications, while preserving a shareholder’s right to request printed materials at any point,

The challenge at the heart of the SEC’s e-delivery debate is easy to identify when you follow the money.

The current system for distributing required fund materials to shareholders who invest through intermediaries, such as broker-dealers, is fundamentally flawed. Complex SEC rules have permitted a single company to create a near-monopoly, employing a conflict-riddled system of “remittances” between the vendor and intermediaries that ensures that both receive substantial fees — fees that ultimately are paid by fund shareholders. The system is so convoluted that the vendor charges even more not to mail documents when an investor opts to receive materials by e-mail.

With a vendor and multiple intermediaries who benefit from and thrive on this system’s complexity and overlapping fees, the SEC has been stymied on e-delivery, despite years of study and commentary. But the commission is supposed to work for investors — and investors are the ones who are paying the fees. For their sake, the SEC needs to tackle both the outmoded delivery system and the fee structure that encourages higher costs and inefficiency.

We are living in a time when as a result of viral concerns, fewer citizens want to receive paper mail, handle paper money or even touch the keyboard of an ATM machine. Such fears may take firmer hold in the months ahead with concerns about “second waves” of contamination. Mandated fund disclosures — including large annual reports and lists of fund securities holdings — have seldom been the first things that investors wanted to grab from their mailboxes to read. Paper reports are going to be even less welcome now.

We have a financial services industry that is constantly innovating around an increasingly digital and virtual economy. In so many respects, we are living in a paperless world. In its rule-making, the Labor Department is creating a path that the SEC can and should follow, for the sake of enhanced disclosure and — most important — the benefit of shareholders. 

Paul Atkins is chief executive of Patomak Global Partners, a financial services consultancy, and a former SEC commissioner.

Related Topics:

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

SEC should accelerate its late leap to electronic delivery

The agency could do more to make e-delivery the default option for shareholder communications, while preserving shareholders’ right to request printed material

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print