Subscribe

Supreme Court rejects student-loan relief plan

Supreme Court

The high court tossed out President Joe Biden's plan to slash the student debt of more than 40 million people.

The Supreme Court tossed out President Joe Biden’s plan to slash the student debt of more than 40 million people, rejecting one of his signature initiatives as exceeding his power.

The justices, voting 6-3 along ideological lines, sided with six Republican-led states that sued to challenge the program, which by one estimate would have cost $400 billion over 30 years. 

Writing for the court, Chief Justice John Roberts said the administration was “seizing the power of the legislature” by trying to cancel more than $400 billion of student debt.

Biden is likely to face renewed pressure from lawmakers and advocates of loan relief to find an alternative way to cancel debt, possibly using a different legal rationale. For now, the high court ruling strips him of an accomplishment as he looks toward his reelection bid next year.

Student loan payments are set to resume in late August after a three-year pause. Millions of people could fall behind on their debt.

The three liberals said the court should have concluded the states lacked the legal right to challenge the loan relief. “In every respect, the court today exceeds its proper, limited role in our nation’s governance,” Justice Elena Kagan wrote for the dissenters.

The conservative-dominated Supreme Court has thwarted Biden’s agenda on multiple occasions. The court stopped Biden from blocking evictions during the pandemic and requiring workers to get Covid vaccines or regular tests. The justices have also slashed the Environmental Protection Agency’s power to address climate change and protect wetlands. 

Biden’s plan would have forgiven as much as $20,000 in federal loans for certain borrowers making less than $125,000 per year, $250,000 for households.

The administration contended the student-loan program was authorized by a 2003 law that gives the education secretary special powers when responding to national emergencies. The law, known as the Heroes Act, says the secretary can “waive or modify” provisions to ensure that debtors “are not placed in a worse position financially” because of a national emergency.

The case is Biden v. Nebraska, 22-506.

[More: Sharing the student debt load]

Short-duration high-yield bonds a sweet spot, says RBC fund manager

Related Topics:

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

Bond yield volatility requires new trading strategies

The market is riskier, but that can mean opportunity.

UBS asset management leadership gets a refresh

The unit is undergoing streamlining, cost reductions.

US inflation stats were accidentally released early

But did the mistake move the markets?

White House wealth: Bidens’ assets and income revealed

Official documents also cover Kamala Harris, Doug Emhoff.

Direxion deploys ETFs for turbocharged AI bets

The thematic ETF leader is offering professional investors a vehicle to amplify their long and short exposures to AI stocks.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print