Look out for hidden swap taxes

Buried in the jobs creation law signed by President Barack Obama last month were a number of tax and reporting provisions that have nothing to do with employment opportunities.
APR 05, 2010
Buried in the jobs creation law signed by President Barack Obama last month were a number of tax and reporting provisions that have nothing to do with employment opportunities. One such provision (the new Subsection K of Internal Revenue Code 871) provides for withholding on those “owning shares synthetically” through swaps. The Hiring Incentives to Restore Employment Act treats as dividends both “substitute dividends” and “dividend-equivalent payments” received by foreign persons. Thus, such payments will be subject to a 30% withholding tax. The swap provisions in the HIRE Act cover swap payments on single stocks, as well as swaps on an index or a basket of securities. One wonders how these rules might affect U.S. tax-exempts — notably the pension plans, foundations and endowments that advisers serve — which own foreign dividend-paying shares synthetically through swaps. The law specifically includes any payment under a “specified notional principal contract” (a swap) that is directly or indirectly determined by the payment of a dividend from sources in the U.S., as is the case with an equity swap. Adding insult to injury, payments are determined on a gross basis. Thus, because a payment is defined as “any gross amount which is used in computing any net amount which is transferred to or from the taxpayer,” a party could be liable for a withholding payment even though it may have received no payments from the swap. These provisions are the culmination of congressional discomfort with this type of trading activity. On Sept. 11, 2008, the Senate's Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations held a hearing on the financial services industry's efforts to help foreign investors reduce the effect of withholding taxes. The subcommittee took aim at the use of equity swaps and stock loans. It also criticized the Internal Revenue Service for being aware of this activity for decades yet doing nothing to change the situation. The concern was with transactions entered into in a circular manner. The legislation targets transactions such as one described by the subcommittee, in which an investment bank bought shares from an offshore hedge fund just before the record date, after which the hedge fund became the same bank's counterparty to an equity swap on the security. At the end of the swap, the bank's trading desk sold the shares back to the hedge fund. At the time, it was thought that the transaction did not require withholding, because payments from the swap were not dividends. Under the new law, a “specified notional principal contract” will be subject to the 30% withholding tax if any of the following apply: • The long party transfers the underlying security to the short party to the contract. • In connection with the termination of the contract, any short party transfers the underlying security to any long party to the contract. • The underlying security is not readily tradable on an established securities market. • The security is posted as collateral by any short party to the contract with any long party to it. • Treasury identifies the contract as covered. Interestingly, Treasury did propose in its Green Book more-encompassing requirements that, as of now, are not part of the HIRE Act. The Treasury Department, and therefore the IRS, has the authority to look for additional transactions close enough to these so that the same withholding rules can be applied. Avoiding fitting within the five types of “specified notional principal contracts” might be possible, say, with an underlying security that is publicly traded, since Treasury would have to take action to -implement the fifth category. The effective date for this new provision is Sept. 14, which is 180 days from enactment of the HIRE Act. Ironically, the swap issue wouldn't exist without the unrelated-business-income-tax rules that drive U.S. tax-exempts to invest offshore. In fact, withholding on these dividends wouldn't even take place if their owners held the shares directly. Tax-exempt investors flock to so-called “offshore blocker funds” so that they won't run afoul of the UBIT rules and be forced to pay tax on their profits. If the government didn't have those rules, the tax-exempts would invest in domestic funds, and this “problem” would disappear. Robert N. Gordon is chief executive of Twenty-First Securities Corp. and an adjunct professor at New York University's Leonard N. Stern School of Business. He can be reached at [email protected]. For archived columns, go to InvestmentNews.com/taxconsciousadviser.

Latest News

The fight over the CFPB is just beginning
The fight over the CFPB is just beginning

Locked out of their offices and told to stay home, employees at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau have asked the courts to intervene as Elon Musk and Republican leaders move to shut down the agency that was established to protect people from predatory lending and financial scams.

Business-focused wealth tech RISR lands $8B Wealthcare Capital Management partnership
Business-focused wealth tech RISR lands $8B Wealthcare Capital Management partnership

Fintech platform interVal has also introduced a new feature to help advisors support entrepreneurial business owner clients better.

LPL boosts revenue potential with amped-up alts platform
LPL boosts revenue potential with amped-up alts platform

Along with greater revenue, alternative investments also carry risks, one industry lawyer noted.

How SageSpring Wealth Partners' next-gen strategy has fueled its success
How SageSpring Wealth Partners' next-gen strategy has fueled its success

President Jeff Dobyns unpacks the strategic power of mentorship, what makes an "ideal team player," and how the firm's 89 percent success rate has paid off for veteran advisors.

Powell heads for hot-seat hearings with ongoing pressure from Trump policies
Powell heads for hot-seat hearings with ongoing pressure from Trump policies

The Fed chair is in for some "hyper-charged" meetings, with legislators likely to raise questions on tariff threats and apparent steps to comply with anti-DEI orders.

SPONSORED Taylor Matthews on what's behind Farther's rapid growth

From 'no clients' to reshaping wealth management, Farther blends tech and trust to deliver family-office experience at scale.

SPONSORED Why wealth advisors should care about the future of federal tax policy

Blue Vault features expert strategies to harness for maximum client advantage.