Subscribe

When the tax man cometh for our troops

InvestmentNews

In addition to worrying about terrorists and buried bombs, it turns out that about 60,000 active-duty troops and reservists have another fear-inducing group gunning for them: the Internal Revenue Service.

A recent story about how members of our armed forces owe the IRS a collective $390 million in back taxes caught my eye, so I felt compelled to do some further digging.

One reason for the big tax bill, tax experts say, is that military returns are more complicated than those of civilians.

It isn’t that their income is so high or that it derives from so many sources. It is more a matter of confusion over complicated eligibility rules for tax breaks on income earned while serving in combat zones.

Ordinarily, U.S. military salaries are taxable just like civilian income. But service members get an exemption from federal income taxes on their entire pay for any month that they serve in a combat zone.

Any additional pay for coming under hostile fire or imminent danger also is tax-exempt.

However, Social Security and Medicare taxes are nonexempt, even for service members in a combat zone.

The law also waives all taxes for troops who die in action. The tax exclusion applies to the soldier’s entire income, not just his or her military pay.

It is very difficult to figure out what to include and what not to include under the various combat zone regulations.

Another issue is that the fact that military families move frequently. This increases the odds that tax documents will wind up in the wrong place. On top of that, there is also the reality that troops are too busy on the battlefield or otherwise occupied in a hospital bed recovering from wounds to keep on top of IRS notification letters warning them about a possible delinquency.

DISASTROUS FOR FAMILIES

Because the IRS is allowed to seize part of a service member’s paycheck until the tax obligation is paid off, this problem has proved to be disastrous for some military families.

In a recent published report, Navy Lt. Cmdr. Steven Millard said that he got into tax trouble a few years ago because of back-to-back deployments and family moves.

It took two years to clear up a post-deployment “late filing,” which had triggered an “insanity of fines and interest,” he said.

I don’t know about you, but when I see someone in uniform, I say, “Thank you,” shake their hand and wish them and their families well.

In an effort to simplify these tax issues and to let our servicemen and women know how much we appreciate what they do, I have a proposal. Let Congress pass the one-page, no pork, nonpartisan “No Tax for Active-Duty Armed Forces Members” law, under which soldiers, sailors, airmen or marines deployed overseas receive their military pay and benefits tax-free until they return home.

Active-duty troops fighting overseas face danger each day. They risk their lives so we can go about our everyday lives in peace and security.

They deserve our deepest gratitude, not nasty notes from the IRS.

Related Topics: ,

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

Jim Pavia: My last column for InvestmentNews

After a decade-long run, it's time to go

Congressional criminals still can collect public pensions

Former Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr. is the latest member of Congress to fall from grace.

Not home for Christmas: Obama, Congress should spend holiday together

Parties need to solve fiscal cliff dilemma before leaving town.

Pavia: Industry should create a single standard for investment advice

The back-and-forth touched off by NAPFA's announcement last Tuesday to go all-CFP next year highlights the fact that after decades of discussion and debate, the financial advisory business is still struggling to define itself.

Advisers need to practice what they preach

Advisers who continue to put off developing and implementing a succession plan are being shortsighted.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print