Top-ranking Senate Dem calls for rise in capital gains rate

Top-ranking Senate Dem calls for rise in capital gains rate
Schumer lacks specifics of tax plan; Republicans balk
OCT 08, 2012
Income rates on the highest earners should snap back to their levels prior to the Bush tax cuts a decade ago, while taxes on investment income should increase, according to a leading Senate Democrat. Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., chairman of the Senate Democratic Policy Committee and the third-ranking Democrat in the chamber, said today that an increasingly popular approach to tax reform — broadening the base and lowering rates across the board — is misguided. Instead, revenue from ending special tax breaks for the wealthy should be used to balance the federal budget. “It would be a huge mistake to take the dollars we gain from closing loopholes and put them into reducing rates for the highest-income brackets, rather than reducing the deficit,” Mr. Schumer said in a speech at the National Press Club in Washington. In his tax-reform proposal, Mr. Schumer called for the top individual rate to return to 39.6%, a reduction in so-called tax expenditures — special tax preferences, deductions and credits — and an increase in the capital gains rate from the current 15%. “Today the top 1% on average receives 20% of its income from capital gains — 10 times as much as the rest of the country,” Mr. Schumer said. “Capital gains makes up 60% of the income reported by the Forbes 400.” But Mr. Schumer stopped short of saying that investment income should be taxed at individual rates. “Now, if you are returning the top income rate to Clinton-era levels, as I have proposed, I do think it is too much to treat capital gains the same as ordinary income,” Mr. Schumer said. “We don't need a 39.6% rate on capital gains.” Mr. Schumer did not indicate his preferred capital gains rate. “It's not my purpose here to put together the specific details of the plan,” Mr. Schumer said. “It's to lay out a path.” Grand bargain After the election, lawmakers will convene a lame-duck session of Congress to address the so-called fiscal cliff — the expiration of the Bush tax breaks coupled with steep domestic spending cuts that will go into effect on Jan. 1 unless lawmakers reach an agreement to avert them. If lawmakers start fiscal-cliff negotiations from the standpoint of reducing income tax rates across the board, they'll either never get around to cutting the deficit or will have to upend tax benefits for those in the middle-income range, Mr. Schumer warned. “It is an alluring prospect to cut taxes on the wealthiest people, reduce the deficit and hold the middle class harmless, but the math dictates you can't have it all,” Mr. Schumer said. Democrats are ready to agree to significant cuts in Medicare spending if Republicans would allow tax revenue to be used for deficit reduction, according to Mr. Schumer. “That is how a grand bargain can be had: Republicans get entitlement reform while Democrats get revenue,” Mr. Schumer said. Republicans balk The immediate Republican reaction was negative. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., said that he and House Speaker John Boehner want to extend all Bush tax cuts for one year. “Senior Democrats are now openly acknowledging their plan to hold the economy hostage to massive, job-killing tax hikes and espousing the fiscally irresponsible view that says the country should be driven off the fiscal cliff rather than Congress working toward bipartisan solutions to reform and strengthen entitlements without killing jobs,” Mr. McConnell said in a statement. A spokeswoman for House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Dave Camp, R-Mich., also threw cold water on Mr. Schumer's proposal. “The American people know when Washington politicians call for higher taxes it is to fuel more Washington spending (not deficit reduction),” Michelle Dimarob, an aide to Mr. Camp, wrote in an e-mail. “Americans don't want to pay more in taxes to bail out Washington; they want tax reform that bails them out of the [President Barack] Obama economy.” Mr. Schumer said his path would carve out protections for middle-income taxpayers. “Tax preferences for things like a college education and retirement savings belong in the tax code even after reform happens,” Mr. Schumer said. “They were put in the code on purpose to make a middle-class lifestyle accessible and sustainable for more American families.” Mr. Schumer also said that Bush tax cuts for households making less than $250,000 should remain in place. “People below [$250,000] should not get any tax increase, period,” Mr. Schumer said.

Latest News

SEC to lose Hester Peirce, deepening a commissioner crisis
SEC to lose Hester Peirce, deepening a commissioner crisis

The "Crypto Mom" departure would leave the SEC commission with just two members and no Democratic commissioners on the panel.

Florida B-D, RIA owner pitches bold long-term plan to sell to advisors
Florida B-D, RIA owner pitches bold long-term plan to sell to advisors

IFP Securities’ owner, Bill Hamm, has a long-term plan for the firm and its 279 financial advisors.

Fintech bytes: Vanilla, Wealth.com forge new estate planning partnerships
Fintech bytes: Vanilla, Wealth.com forge new estate planning partnerships

Meanwhile, a Osaic and Envestnet ink a new adaptive wealthtech partnership to better support the firm's 10,000-plus advisors, and RIA-focused VastAdvisor unveils native integrations with leading CRMs.

Fiduciary failure: Ex-advisor who sold practice fined after clients lost millions
Fiduciary failure: Ex-advisor who sold practice fined after clients lost millions

A former Alabama investment advisor and ex-Kestra rep has been permanently barred and penalized after clients he promised to protect got caught in a $2.6 million fraud.

Why the evolution of ETFs is changing the due diligence equation
Why the evolution of ETFs is changing the due diligence equation

As more active strategies get packaged into the ETF wrapper, advisors and investors have to look beyond expense ratios as the benchmark for value.

SPONSORED Are hedge funds the missing ingredient?

Wellington explores how multi strategy hedge funds may enhance diversification

SPONSORED Beyond wealth management: Why the future of advice is becoming more human

As technical expertise becomes increasingly commoditized, advisors who can integrate strategy, relationships, and specialized expertise into a cohesive client experience will define the next era of wealth management