Subscribe

Trade associations plan to step up political spending in campaign year

Capitol-with-jogger-Trade-associations-pace-political-contributions

The Financial Services Institute and an insurance group are among those varying from their pace in previous cycles

Several trade associations representing financial advisers are lagging behind the usual pace of their spending on congressional campaigns, but they say they will step up their political donations this year.

In 2019, the Financial Services Institute contributed $80,000 to lawmakers’ coffers, according to its Jan. 31 filing with the Federal Election Commission. That figure covers the first year of the two-year 2020 election cycle.

For the full two-year cycle in 2018, FSI made $198,500 in political contributions. In 2016, it made $331,000 in contributions, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.

The organization, which is made up of independent broker-dealers and financial advisers, said it has added a staff member who is working on its political action committee and has done other restructuring of the unit. Its campaign spending will soon increase.

“We have an aggressive plan to deploy our PAC resources this year,” David Bellaire, FSI executive vice president and general counsel, told reporters at the group’s OneVoice conference in San Diego last Tuesday.

FSI Chief Executive Dale Brown touted the fact that the association’s revenue topped $10 million for the second straight year. He said some of that money is being used to bolster FSI’s political outreach on Capitol Hill.

“We didn’t have those resources in the past,” Mr. Brown said. “FSI PAC is an important tool in a larger tool chest for how we pursue our mission.”

The National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors is also off its political spending pace from previous campaign cycles. It contributed $488,750 in 2019, compared to $2 million for the 2018 cycle and $2.1 million for the 2016 cycle.

Diane Boyle, NAIFA senior vice president for government relations, attributed the slowdown to the fact that a number of congressional candidates are refusing PAC contributions and that there are a large number of retirements.

“We expect to fully fund candidates who demonstrate a willingness to understand the financial security our members provide to Main Street families and businesses,” Ms. Boyle said in a statement.

Lobbying groups typically contribute to incumbent lawmakers who serve on committees that make policy affecting financial advisers — the House Financial Services Committee and the Senate Banking Committee, for instance. They also tend to contribute to both Republicans and Democrats, with a preponderance of their contributions going to the party that is in the majority.

The money that’s contributed to political campaigns comes from trade association members. Political donations are generally seen as a way to increase the groups’ access to lawmakers and their staffs. Broker and insurance industry lobbyists usually give much more to members of Congress than groups representing investment advisers.

The Insured Retirement Institute is ahead of its usual campaign spending pace, contributing $148,500 in 2019, compared to $231,000 in the 2018 cycle and $187,200 in the 2016 cycle.  The American Council of Life Insurers spent $598,000 in 2019, while contributing $1.2 million for the 2018 cycle and $1.3 million for the 2016 cycle.

Two of the heaviest hitters on political spending are the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, which made $323,500 in donations in 2019, and the Investment Company Institute, which represents the mutual fund industry and made $1 million in contributions. SIFMA is behind its downward spending trajectory in the 2018 ($697,408) and 2016 ($821,300) cycles, while ICI is on track to match the $1.9 million in contributions it made in 2016 and again in 2018.

The Financial Planning Association contributed $32,500 to candidates in 2019. It also had its largest PAC fundraising event ever at its annual conference in October. Its board will make political spending decisions in May, said Karen Nystrom, FPA director of advocacy. The group made $79,500 in political donations in 2018 and $81,500 in 2016.

The Investment Adviser Association contributed $26,000 to political campaigns in 2019, compared to $47,000 in the 2018 cycle and $36,000 in the 2016 cycle. It is on track to make about $40,000 in contributions for the full 2020 cycle, according to Neil Simon, IAA vice president for government relations.

Related Topics: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

FPA, CFP Board diverge on DOL investment advice proposal

While the CFP Board supports the proposal, the FPA has expressed concerns about the DOL rule potentially raising compliance costs for members, increasing the cost of advice and reducing access to advice for some.

Braxton encourages RIAs to see investing in diversity as a business strategy

‘If a firm values its human capital, then it will make an investment to make sure that their talent can flourish for the advancement of the bottom line,’ says Lazetta Rainey Braxton, co-CEO of 2050 Wealth Partners.

Bill chips away at SALT block but comes with drawbacks, advisors say

'I’d love to see the [full] SALT deduction come back but not if it means rates go up,' one advisor says.

Former Morgan Stanley broker running for office reviewing $147K award

Deborah Adeimy claimed firm blocked her from running in GOP primary, aide says 'we're unclear how award figure was calculated.'

GOP bill to kill SEC proposal on advisor AI conflicts faces obstacles

It’s more likely the GOP will make a point about their frustrations with the SEC than actually get the bill through the Democratic-controlled Senate.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print