Citi still going after brokers for 'meritless' suit over bonuses

After winning dismissal of a class action claim brought by six former Smith Barney brokers last month, Citigroup is vowing to go after the brokers for legal fees.
APR 26, 2010
By  Bloomberg
After winning dismissal of a class action claim brought by six former Smith Barney brokers last month, Citigroup is vowing to go after the brokers for legal fees. In dismissing the case, Thomas Banus v. Citi, U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan described the suit as "baseless" and "an attempt to use the judicial process for the quite improper purpose of simply stalling [Citi's] effort to collect the money it is owed" from balances due on promissory notes. "Citi intends to enforce its contractual right to recover attorneys' fees and costs from plaintiffs for pursuing this meritless litigation," Citigroup Inc. spokesman Alexander Samuelson said in a statement. "It is clear from the terms of the promissory notes they signed that these financial advisers are responsible for reimbursing Citi the hundreds of thousands of dollars the company was forced to incur in defending the lawsuit," he said. Citigroup would have to file a motion with the court for attorneys' fees. The firm has not yet made such a request. Mr. Samuelson wouldn't comment on when Citi might file. Getting hit for costs "is a risk — it's always a risk" in pursuing litigation, said Reno, Nev., attorney Mark Thierman, the lead plaintiff's attorney on the Banus class action case. Mr. Thierman, who made a name for himself among brokers for successfully suing Wall Street firms for overtime pay, said he will appeal Mr. Kaplan's ruling. Mr. Banus sued Citigroup in New York federal court in August. An amended complaint in October added five other former Citigroup brokers, who the bank said received signing bonuses ranging from Mr. Banus' $45,675 to as much as $801,546. The plaintiffs sought class action status on behalf of at least 500 brokers employed by Citigroup in the previous six years who executed promissory notes. They asked the court to rule that they don't owe the money. Newly hired brokers are typically given loans, portions of which are forgiven annually for a number of years. If the broker leaves before the loan is completely forgiven, the remaining portion must be paid back with interest. Banus called that requirement “unconscionable” in his complaint. He said he shouldn't have to pay all at once the $39,000 left on his forgivable signing bonus loan when he quit in 2006. Bloomberg contributed to this story

Latest News

SEC Says Game Service Roblox Part of ‘Active Investigation’
SEC Says Game Service Roblox Part of ‘Active Investigation’

Short sellers previously said the company was under investigation, though Roblox denied allegations.

Musk’s DOGE descends on CFPB with intention to shut it down
Musk’s DOGE descends on CFPB with intention to shut it down

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is in the crosshairs of the Republican group that is widely attempting to dismantle government agencies.

Advisor fighting Finra banishment loses $17.7 million dispute with old firm
Advisor fighting Finra banishment loses $17.7 million dispute with old firm

National Securities Corp. sued the advisor in 2020, alleging breach of contract and unjust enrichment.

Job numbers, inflation leaving room for Fed to hold rates
Job numbers, inflation leaving room for Fed to hold rates

Recent data support a measured pace by the Federal Reserve for the year ahead.

Private assets remain hot despite surging stock market
Private assets remain hot despite surging stock market

Financial advisors are still adding alternatives despite the surge in publicly traded stock prices

SPONSORED Taylor Matthews on what's behind Farther's rapid growth

From 'no clients' to reshaping wealth management, Farther blends tech and trust to deliver family-office experience at scale.

SPONSORED Why wealth advisors should care about the future of federal tax policy

Blue Vault features expert strategies to harness for maximum client advantage.