Government's reach worries big-firm reps

Brokers and industry observers worry that the Department of the Treasury's capital purchase program to inject $250 billion into the financial services industry could mark a new era of government control and mistrust of the industry.
OCT 19, 2008
Brokers and industry observers worry that the Department of the Treasury's capital purchase program to inject $250 billion into the financial services industry could mark a new era of government control and mistrust of the industry. "It looks like the whole financial sector is being taken over," said a broker in the Northeast for Merrill Lynch & Co. Inc. of New York, who asked not to be identified. "The Federal Reserve can come in and [threaten] to 'Wachovize' you, or 'IndyMac' you, because you're not playing along" with demands to raise more capital, said a rep in the Northwest for Wachovia Securities LLC of St. Louis, referring to the government's role in forcing the firm's parent, Wachovia Corp. of Charlotte, N.C., to sell itself and the July seizure by regulators of Pasadena, Calif.-based IndyMac Bank FSB. This rep also asked not to be identified. The capital purchase plan is "one indicator of substantial government intervention in the marketplace," said Dale Brown, executive director of the Financial Services Institute Inc. in Atlanta, which represents independent-contractor firms. He doesn't expect FSI member firms to be directly affected by the program.

TOP PRIORITY

But "where does this road end?" Mr. Brown asked. Regulatory reform will be the top priority under a new administration and in Congress, he said. "We anticipate more intrusion, not less." "We've taken the position that banks need to feel free to participate [in the capital purchase program], knowing that there are restrictions on the level of government involvement in their institutions," said Peter Garuccio, spokesman for the American Bankers Association in Washington. A spokesman for the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association of New York and Washington did not return calls for comment. However, in a statement last week, SIFMA said it supported the capital purchase program. Under the Treasury Department plan, the government could end up getting significant common stock ownership in the big brokers and banks. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson said last week that the U.S. was "not looking to come in and take meaningful ownership percentages." Included in the department's plan are some limits on executive compensation and corporate governance standards. Mr. Garuccio said the ABA "really didn't take issue with that ... We discussed some of the finer points [with government officials] but we certainly didn't oppose [pay limits]." Despite concerns about the government's ultimate role, few questioned the need for regulators to act. "If there is anything that will bring some confidence back, it's this [Treasury program]," said a Smith Barney rep in the South who asked not to be identified. Smith Barney is the brokerage unit of Citigroup Inc. of New York. "It was a good sign that [industry chief executives] signed on" last week to the program, this broker added. "They all took their medicine like big men." Many observers and analysts say that injecting capital into the industry makes more sense than simply removing troubled assets. SIFMA, though, continues to support government purchase of troubled assets. In addition to the capital purchase program, SIFMA last week said that the industry also needed price discovery for the frozen assets that remain on balance sheets. "Until we have an idea what these assets are worth, loans will remain hard to come by," the Wall Street trade group said. But with the Treasury moving toward recapitalization as its first effort, "Wall Street [firms] this time [didn't] get what they wanted," the Smith Barney rep said. "They got us into this trouble," the broker added. "If [the industry] doesn't like [taking government money], tough." In pondering the government's role, people have to realize that "this is the anti-capitalist movement now taking over," said a Merrill broker in the Southeast who asked not to be identified. "It's very much comparable to the '60s and '70s" when the public held a negative opinion of business. "You just need to figure out how to capitalize on this cycle," he said. This broker expects another bout of inflation to emerge. He said having clients exposed to commodity markets is one way to protect them. E-mail Dan Jamieson at [email protected].

Latest News

House panel unanimously advances advisor compensation reform bill
House panel unanimously advances advisor compensation reform bill

A bipartisan proposal aimed at aligning advisor compensation rules with modern business structures is headed to the full House.

Vanilla, WealthFeed land new RIA partnerships
Vanilla, WealthFeed land new RIA partnerships

Vanilla is extending its estate planning tech to Callan Family Office's ultra-high-net-worth business, while WealthFeed's organic growth engine will now be available to roughly 100 advisors at The Mather Group.

As Trump Accounts prep for July 4 launch, Franklin Templeton plans $1,000 match
As Trump Accounts prep for July 4 launch, Franklin Templeton plans $1,000 match

“We are helping families take an important first step toward building a financial foundation for the next generation,” said Franklin Templeton CEO Jenny Johnson

Savant Wealth Management enters Maine with latest acquisition
Savant Wealth Management enters Maine with latest acquisition

Richard Brothers Financial Advisors joins the fee-only RIA, adding its first Maine office and $240 million in client assets

Clearstead adds $5.3B Philadelphia wealth team from myCIO
Clearstead adds $5.3B Philadelphia wealth team from myCIO

Cleveland RIA grows to $68 billion in assets as Philadelphia team, deepening its high-net-worth and retirement-plan practice.

SPONSORED Who builds the income when the pension disappears?

Dan Biagini of American Equity says the steady decline of pensions, longer lifespans and a reset in interest rates are rewriting how advisors build retirement income

SPONSORED Why direct indexing stopped being optional

Direct indexing is on pace to outgrow ETFs and mutual funds. Northern Trust's Ken Lassner explains why the advisors who get it wish they had started sooner.