A three-person FINRA arbitration panel on Tuesday found Fidelity Brokerage Services liable to pay almost $1.29 million in damages to two sets of investors in a claim that involved complex structured products and notes.
Fidelity was ordered to pay $843,000 in compensatory damages to James and Tina Baldocchi and $445,000 to Kimberly Hosler and James Doorley, according to the FINRA panel’s award.
The investors in both claims made a variety of allegations against Fidelity, including negligence and a breach of fiduciary duty, related to clients’ investments in structured products or notes.
The arbitration decision did not provide any detail about whether the salesperson involved was a broker, registered investment advisor, or a representative at a call center. The salesperson was not identified in the arbitration award.
A Fidelity spokesperson did not immediately comment on Wednesday.
Matthew Thibaut, the attorney for both groups of investors, also did not immediately respond to comment.
Structured products and notes, however, are complex financial instruments and require extra supervision from firms when they are sold to customers.
The performance of structured notes is typically tied to an underlying asset, such as a specific stock or an index such as the S&P 500 stock index. Customers buy the products and get some protection from a loss in the investments but have gains, or the upside, capped.
“In some investor claims, it’s a double whammy,” said Scott Silver, a plaintiff’s attorney. “Fidelity is a powerful name for retail investors, plus it works as a custodian for RIAs, and the custodian is supposed to be the guardian at the gate here.”
Investors and plaintiff attorneys have been arguing for years that RIA custodians like Schwab and Fidelity should be sued via FINRA Dispute Resolution Services in such disputes because those firms have obligations when involved in sales of structured products – or other complex investments – to vet those products.
FINRA Dispute Resolution Services is a private industry forum through which most clients file lawsuits and complaints against firms and individual financial advisors.
When structure notes or products go wrong, broker-dealers can wind up in costly litigation.
A three-person arbitration panel overseen by FINRA Dispute Resolution Services last March stunned the financial advice industry when it awarded clients of Stifel Financial $133 million in damages and legal fees in a dispute centered on a former star broker in Miami, Chuck Roberts.
David Jannetti and family members in 2023 sued Stifel Nicolaus & Co., the broker-dealer subsidiary of Stifel Financial, claiming at least $5 million in damages related to investments in structured notes, a strategy that has resulted in several previous significant arbitration claims and tens of millions of dollars in damages to clients.
A federal magistrate judge made a recommendation this month to a federal trial court judge in Miami to deny Stifel’s motion to vacate the $133 million award, the largest award in FINRA history in a retail customer arbitration.
While technical expertise is necessary, sustainable trust is only possible for advisors who know how and when to lean on the emotional side of advice.
Betterment, F2 Strategy and WealthReach push AI deeper into advisory firm operations with three deals this week.
Retirement expectations widen from reality, according to Natixis Investment Managers' annual Global Retirement Index.
Half of planners have seen clients raid retirement savings or cut contributions as affordability pressures mount, CFP Board finds
In a constant fight over control of clients, the financial advice industry has a long history of such allegations and disputes.
As AI makes financial information more accessible than ever, Lana Hock explains why human judgment, trust, and empathy remain the qualities clients value most in a financial advisor
Northern Trust’s Ken Lassner shows advisors how to convert volatility into after-tax portfolio gains
