SIFMA defends mandatory-arbitration system

NEW YORK — As some U.S. senators find fault with the arbitration system that resolves client disputes with broker-dealers, the brokerage industry’s largest trade group is defending the process.
MAY 14, 2007
By  Bloomberg
NEW YORK — As some U.S. senators find fault with the arbitration system that resolves client disputes with broker-dealers, the brokerage industry’s largest trade group is defending the process. In a May 4 letter to Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Christopher Cox, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., and committee member Russell Feingold, D-Wis., asked the SEC to ban mandatory arbitration “in fulfillment of its statutory duty to protect individual investors.” The two senators want to change the legal process for investors and broker-dealers, arguing that it is wrong to force investors into arbitration and that they should have greater choice in resolving legal disputes. But last Tuesday, an official with the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association of New York and Washington defended the system, though he conceded that it has evolved over the years. Arbitration has gotten to be so much like traditional court litigation that the industry may lose interest in keeping disputes in arbitration, SIFMA general counsel Ira Hammerman said at the annual public-policy conference held in Washington by the North American Securities Administrators Association Inc. of Washington. “Arbitration is not perfect,” Mr. Hammerman said, but it is a more efficient way for customers to voice their claims. Most investors sign agreements requiring them to take disputes to NASD’s arbitration system. At the NASAA meeting, another Senate Banking Committee member wholeheartedly agreed with his two colleagues. “We’ve got to make sure that those who are seeking real redress have that opportunity to do that,” said Sen. Robert Casey, D-Pa. “Today I’m joining [Mr. Leahy and Mr. Feingold] in that call,” he said. “That was the right thing to do.” Broker-dealers essentially force clients into selecting arbitration, Mr. Leahy and Mr. Feingold wrote in the letter to Mr. Cox. “The SEC should act to require that brokers allow investors to have an actual choice between the courts and arbitration, thereby restoring the element of voluntariness assumed by the court,” they wrote. Although Mr. Leahy and Mr. Feingold are looking for change in securities arbitration, they recognize its strengths. “The appeal of arbitration and mediation for disputes that are relatively straightforward or that involve modest damages will ensure that such alternative dispute resolution processes can continue to be the primary means for resolving disputes even after the implementation of a rule that is more protective of investors,” they wrote. But the two senators certainly want the avenue of the courts open for investors in some way, they said. Two Supreme Court cases from the 1980s paved the way for broad judicial enforcement of mandatory arbitration clauses under federal laws, they noted. “In both cases, the assumptions and rationale underlying the Supreme Court’s rulings are clear: that arbitration increases rather than limits options and that the SEC will actively monitor arbitration to ensure it offers adequate investor protection,” the two lawmakers wrote. “That mandatory arbitration clauses are now an industry norm — and thus a de facto requirement imposed upon investors — is a significant shift from one of the presumptions essential to the court’s decisions,” they wrote. A spokesman for the SEC, John Nester, said that the commission had “no response” to the letter. Washington bureau chief Sara Hansard contributed to this story. Bruce Kelly can be reached at [email protected].

Latest News

'Bogged down' advisors just want to have fun (again)
'Bogged down' advisors just want to have fun (again)

Jim Cahn, of Wealth Enhancement Group, lifts the lid on his firm's partnership model, his views on RIA M&A, and the widely slept-on reason why advisors are merging into larger organizations.

Vestwell unveils new emergency savings account offering
Vestwell unveils new emergency savings account offering

The fintech firm is cementing its status in the workplace savings space with its latest ESA offering, which employers can integrate into their existing benefits package.

'Money Mimosas' and other ways to show your Valentine financial love
'Money Mimosas' and other ways to show your Valentine financial love

Wealth managers offer unique ideas for couples to grow closer emotionally and financially.

Limra research finds financial confidence on the rise among Black American workers
Limra research finds financial confidence on the rise among Black American workers

Survey findings suggest increased sense of financial security and more optimistic 2025 outlook, while highlighting employers' role in ensuring retirement readiness.

DOGE efforts sideswipe muni bonds backed by federal lease payments
DOGE efforts sideswipe muni bonds backed by federal lease payments

Falling prices for some securities within the $4 trillion state and local government debt market spotlight how the push to shrink spending is sending shockwaves across the US.

SPONSORED Record growth: Interval funds emerge as key players in alternative investments

Blue Vault Alts Summit highlights the role of liquidity-focused funds in reshaping advisor strategies

SPONSORED Taylor Matthews on what's behind Farther's rapid growth

From 'no clients' to reshaping wealth management, Farther blends tech and trust to deliver family-office experience at scale.