Subscribe

CFP Board renews emphasis on comp disclosure

In wake of Goldfarb resignation, trade group to cut "salary" from options.

The Certified Financial Planner Board of Standards Inc. is putting a renewed emphasis on compensation disclosure in the wake of a disciplinary action this year involving its former chairman.
Next week, the organization will send the roughly 68,000 CFP mark holders a notice “regarding the importance of accurate compensation disclosures,” according to a webinar today hosted by CFP Board officials. It also is revamping the search function on its website to narrow the possible forms of compensation an investment adviser can select to describe how he or she is paid.
Currently, the four options are commission, commission and fee, fee-only and salary. As of Aug. 15, the CFP Board will drop “salary” from its Find a CFP Professional search tool. The “salary” description doesn’t accurately reflect how a client pays an adviser, according to Marilyn Mohrman-Gillis, managing director of public policy and communications for the CFP Board.
In the webinar, Michael Shaw, the CFP Board’s managing director of professional standards and legal, said that CFPs must take into account several dimensions of compensation when reporting it.
“You need to look first at how the client is paying for services and to whom the client is paying,” Mr. Shaw said.
Fees from a client to a CFP and to a third party, such as a broker-dealer or insurance company, and fees paid to a CFP from a third-party must all be disclosed as compensation. For instance, if a CFP’s employer receives 12(b)-1 fees, the CFP has to indicate that he or she receives commissions. In addition, pay from referral agreements also must be disclosed.
The CFP Board does not audit compensation disclosures, but it does investigate allegations of inaccuracies. One such case resulted in the CFP Board sending a letter of admonition to Alan Goldfarb, a former CFP Board chairman, in April.
The CFP Board’s disciplinary panel found that Mr. Goldfarb misrepresented his compensation first as “fee-only” and later as “salary” when he was with the registered investment adviser Weaver Wealth Management LLC. The panel wrote that Mr. Goldfarb was also a registered representative and part owner of a broker-dealer that “received or were entitled to receive compensation such as commission and 12(b)-1 fees.”
Mr. Goldfarb resigned as CFP Board chairman last fall. He disputed the claims but did not appeal. He left Weaver late last year to form his own firm, Financial Strategies Group LLC in Dallas.
The CFP Board stressed that it gives mark holders latitude in the ways they’re paid.
“We don’t dictate any particular business model or compensation model,” Mr. Shaw said.

Related Topics:

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

Wealth firms must prepare for demise of non-competes, despite legal challenges to FTC rule

A growing sentiment against restricting employee moves could affect non-solicitation, too.

FPA, CFP Board diverge on DOL investment advice proposal

While the CFP Board supports the proposal, the FPA has expressed concerns about the DOL rule potentially raising compliance costs for members, increasing the cost of advice and reducing access to advice for some.

Braxton encourages RIAs to see investing in diversity as a business strategy

‘If a firm values its human capital, then it will make an investment to make sure that their talent can flourish for the advancement of the bottom line,’ says Lazetta Rainey Braxton, co-CEO of 2050 Wealth Partners.

Bill chips away at SALT block but comes with drawbacks, advisors say

'I’d love to see the [full] SALT deduction come back but not if it means rates go up,' one advisor says.

Former Morgan Stanley broker running for office reviewing $147K award

Deborah Adeimy claimed firm blocked her from running in GOP primary, aide says 'we're unclear how award figure was calculated.'

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print