Testing the limits of ETF tax efficiency

Testing the limits of ETF tax efficiency
Index tweak forces ETF providers to get creative.
OCT 06, 2016
Investors in exchange-traded funds don't normally have to fret about tax bills, because tax efficiency is one of the main sales pitches right along with transparency, liquidity and lower fees. But thanks to recent adjustments in certain indexes that some ETFs track, the threat of a tax bill has forced some ETF providers into scramble mode to try and limit the fallout — the full extent of which remains unclear. In essence, when S&P Dow Jones Indices and MSCI Inc. created an eleventh sector in September by separating real estate from financials, $30 billion worth of financial-sector ETFs had to figure out how to cleanly remove nearly $6 billion worth of real estate exposure. How the handful of firms most impacted by the index shift managed the challenge says plenty about the ingenuity in the ETF space, especially when there was no blueprint to follow. But it also says plenty about a reality of passive-ETF investing: The indexed ETFs are mandated to track the benchmark, no matter what. State Street Global Advisors, manager of the largest financial sector ETF, the $14 billion Financial Select Sector SPDR (XLF), is trying to dampen the tax impact by moving the real estate holdings into the Real Estate Select Sector SPDR (XLRE). For investors in XLF, their exposure to financials and real estate will not change, but by shifting 20%, or about $3 billion, of the financial-sector ETF into the real estate ETF, they will feel the pinch of a tax similar to a dividend distribution. According to Dave Mazza, State Street's head of ETF research, 74% of the distribution to the real estate ETF will be counted as a return of capital, and 26% will be taxed as ordinary income. “We find this method to be fairly tax efficient, but we won't know the exact details until after the fiscal year ends Sept. 30,” he said. Managing the ETF representing roughly half of all the financial-sector ETF assets, State Street had the unique challenge of navigating both the tax consequences on investors and the impact on the market of selling the real estate holdings. “There was a consideration to just sell the real estate, but the idea of selling $3 billion worth of securities indiscriminately on one day was not an attractive option to us,” Mr. Mazza said. “We looked at the impact and what it would do to the share prices.” Guggenheim Investments followed a strategy similar to State Street's by carving out the real estate exposure from its $106 million Guggenheim S&P 500 Equal Weight Financial ETF (RYF), and distributing it to investors through the Guggenheim S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (EWRE). Because of the smaller size of Guggenheim's fund, the market impact was less significant than were the tax consequences, and a company spokesman confirms that it is not yet clear what the ultimate tax impact will be. For its part, The Vanguard Group trimmed its real estate exposure from the $3.2 billion Vanguard Financial ETF (VFH) by selling the holdings, and essentially treating it like an index rebalancing. Rich Powers, head of ETF product development at Vanguard, said he is not anticipating a taxable event for shareholders because the sale of the real estate securities will be offset by realized capital losses in the fund. “This is probably one of the larger changes we've seen to an index in the last 15 years,” Mr. Powers said. “But it was kind of a push in terms of the tax impact.” Fidelity Investments didn't directly respond to a request regarding its $234 million Fidelity MSCI Financial ETF (FNCL), but an email response from the company suggests it is following the Vanguard approach of treating the changes like an index rebalancing. The statement from Fidelity begins by confirming that “it's too early to say what the tax implications will be of any repositioning.” Truer words might never have been spoken. As Todd Rosenbluth, director of ETF research at S&P Global Market Intelligence, put it, investors have been groomed to expect the ETF structure to be highly tax efficient. “It's a relatively big deal, because investors will likely see greater than the zero capital gains tax they were expecting,” he said. Regardless of how the various ETF providers have hustled to try and limit the impact, Brian Mackey, senior research analyst at Adviser Investments, said it exposes the “Achilles heel of index investing, in general.” “Without any ability to do otherwise, they have to make the change to keep tracking the index,” he said. “I have no doubt the ETF providers are doing all they can, but they have to follow the index, that's the difference between active versus passive.”

Latest News

In an AI world, investors still look for the human touch
In an AI world, investors still look for the human touch

AI is no replacement for trusted financial advisors, but it can meaningfully enhance their capabilities as well as the systems they rely on.

This viral motivational speaker can also be your Prudential financial advisor
This viral motivational speaker can also be your Prudential financial advisor

Prudential's Jordan Toma is no "Finfluencer," but he is a registered financial advisor with four million social media followers and a message of overcoming personal struggles that's reached kids in 150 school across the US.

Fintech bytes: GReminders and Advisor CRM announce AI-related updates
Fintech bytes: GReminders and Advisor CRM announce AI-related updates

GReminders is deepening its integration partnership with a national wealth firm, while Advisor CRM touts a free new meeting tool for RIAs.

SEC charges barred ex-Merrill broker behind Bain Capital private equity fraud
SEC charges barred ex-Merrill broker behind Bain Capital private equity fraud

The Texas-based former advisor reportedly bilked clients out of millions of dollars, keeping them in the dark with doctored statements and a fake email domain.

Trump's tax bill passes senate in hard-fought victory for Republicans
Trump's tax bill passes senate in hard-fought victory for Republicans

The $3.3 trillion tax and spending cut package narrowly got through the upper house, with JD Vance casting the deciding vote to overrule three GOP holdouts.

SPONSORED How advisors can build for high-net-worth complexity

Orion's Tom Wilson on delivering coordinated, high-touch service in a world where returns alone no longer set you apart.

SPONSORED RILAs bring stability, growth during volatile markets

Barely a decade old, registered index-linked annuities have quickly surged in popularity, thanks to their unique blend of protection and growth potential—an appealing option for investors looking to chart a steadier course through today's choppy market waters, says Myles Lambert, Brighthouse Financial.