Reining in expungements

Move to restrict broker expungement should improve confidence that the arbitration system is fair to investors.
OCT 20, 2015
The vote by the Finra Board of Governors to make it more difficult for brokers to expunge black marks from their public records is welcome, and should improve confidence that the arbitration system is fair to investors. When, as a study by the Public Investors Arbitration Bar Association showed, up to 90% of expungement requests were granted by arbitration panels, something is clearly out of whack. It is unlikely that 90% of brokers who have upset their clients enough to prompt an arbitration award have completely reformed their ways and deserve to have their records cleared. The fact that such a high percentage of expungement requests is granted throws a cloud over the whole arbitration system, suggesting it is biased in favor of brokers. The move by the board of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc. rightly reminds arbitrators that expungement is an extraordinary remedy that should be granted only under “appropriate circumstances.”

PROVIDING MORE DETAILS

The board said customer dispute information should be expunged “only when it has no meaningful investor protection or regulatory value.” It is appropriate also that an arbitration board should provide more details of the rationale for granting any expungement, and should examine a broker's BrokerCheck report when making the decision. Arbitration panels are supposed to determine if an investor has been wronged by a broker and, if so, to redress the wrong in a fair and expeditious manner. An unspoken responsibility is to help protect other investors from broker misbehavior or carelessness. Therefore, arbitrators must not be too ready to expunge awards against brokers. Such records are important information for investors to have when deciding whether or not to trust their hard-earned savings to a particular broker. Finra's action builds on the protection provided last year when the SEC approved a rule that prevents firms from including in settlement agreements a stipulation that claimants would not oppose expungement. Finra could take one more step: Make more effort to ensure the claimant in a dispute attends any expungement hearing, though if arbitration panels follow the new instructions, this should become less important.

Latest News

Regulation lags rising private credit risks as retail access widens
Regulation lags rising private credit risks as retail access widens

New CFA Institute research calls for tougher valuation rules and suitability standards as private credit funds court wealth management clients.

LPL Financial, Raymond James land advisors managing $470M
LPL Financial, Raymond James land advisors managing $470M

Michigan father-son team with nearly 50 years of combined experience joins LPL, while a New Jersey advisor moves from Ameriprise to RJFS.

Wealth transfer timing: why waiting is the costliest mistake families make
Wealth transfer timing: why waiting is the costliest mistake families make

UBS expert Sarah Salomon says stewardship is built over time, not handed over in a will.

US fintech investment tops $80bn in H1 2026, driven by mega-deals
US fintech investment tops $80bn in H1 2026, driven by mega-deals

KPMG's Pulse of Fintech report finds American dealmaking dominated global totals, with AI and payments consolidation reshaping where capital flows.

Advisor says retirement plan defaults still target an average
Advisor says retirement plan defaults still target an average

ERISA Investment Fiduciary Philip Chao says most retirement plans use target date funds as a one-size-fits-all default that ignores individual circumstances

SPONSORED Direct indexing webinar targets tax-loss harvesting amid market swings

Northern Trust’s Ken Lassner shows advisors how to convert volatility into after-tax portfolio gains

SPONSORED Who builds the income when the pension disappears?

Dan Biagini of American Equity says the steady decline of pensions, longer lifespans and a reset in interest rates are rewriting how advisors build retirement income