JPMorgan Chase & Co. strategists are dropping their longtime preference for technology stocks one day before the U.S. elections as they forecast a change in market leadership, no matter who wins the vote.
After being overweight tech for almost two years, strategists led by Mislav Matejka slashed to neutral the sector that has driven the recovery rally since March and raised their recommendation on banking and insurance stocks to overweight. Their call comes after the Nasdaq 100 Index has tumbled nearly 9% since Oct. 12.
“We believe the markets are primed for a broadening in leadership, having seen record-ever bifurcation so far year-to-date,” JPMorgan strategists including Prabhav Bhadani and Nitya Saldanha wrote in a note Monday. “The sector and style rotation is likely to get underway irrespective of the U.S. elections winner, while the regional rotation would be more dependent on the actual election outcome.”
U.S. tech giants have been leading the market recovery from March lows as investors viewed them as key winners from lockdowns. However, the Nasdaq 100 Index has fallen since reaching a peak in September on concerns about frothy valuations. Last week saw its worst sell-off in seven months after Apple Inc.’s iPhone sales and Twitter Inc.’s user growth both missed estimates.
The rotation in market leadership would stem from an economic recovery and possible positive news on the pandemic, according to JPMorgan. The strategists said tech’s outperformance could stall if bond yields start rising next year, even though their earnings and balance sheet fundamentals remain supportive. Banks and insurance stocks would in turn benefit from a pick-up in bond yields.
A clear outcome for the election would be a positive for equity investors, according to JPMorgan, as the market could then focus on fiscal stimulus measures. A contested result would lead to selling, they say, while recommending buying any weakness on a three- to six-month horizon.
And although a “blue wave” of Democratic wins and concerns over unfriendly market policies could also pressure stocks, the strategists say, they would see this as a chance to add to portfolios on bets of increased fiscal stimulus, a weaker U.S. dollar, steeper yield curve and easing trade uncertainty. While Matejka’s team is overweight U.S. and China stocks, which have outperformed Europe and emerging markets this year, they see this trend possibly changing in 2021.
“U.S. leadership has been consistent with growth outperforming value, and tech outperforming banks. This might not continue in 2021,” they write.
Meanwhile, Raymond James and Tritonpoint Partners separately welcomed father-son teams, including a breakaway from UBS in Missouri.
Paul Atkins has asked staff to solicit public comment on novel ETFs, pausing the clock on as many as 24 filings linked to the booming event contracts market.
From 401(k)s to retail funds, Deloitte sees private equity and credit crossing into mainstream investing on two fronts at once.
Big-name defections from Morgan Stanley, UBS, and Merrill Lynch headline a busy two weeks of recruiting for the wirehouse.
Markets have always been unpredictable. What has changed is the amount of information investors are trying to process and the growing role advisors play in helping clients avoid emotional decisions
Wellington explores how multi strategy hedge funds may enhance diversification
As technical expertise becomes increasingly commoditized, advisors who can integrate strategy, relationships, and specialized expertise into a cohesive client experience will define the next era of wealth management
