Subscribe

Morgan Stanley ordered to pay $782,272 for mishandling estate

Finra arbitrators ruled on the estate's claim that Morgan Stanley ignored rules laid out by a court for how funds in the estate were to be handled.

Finra arbitrators ordered Morgan Stanley to pay $782,272 for unauthorized transactions in an estate account.

The estate of Joan Ellard — through its personal representative Stephanie (nee Ellard) Epstein — claimed that Morgan Stanley ignored rules laid out by a court for how funds in the estate were to be handled.

“The causes of action related to [the estate’s] allegations that, at a time when [Morgan Stanley] had actual knowledge of the limits on a limited conservator’s authority, it transferred large sums of money from Joan Ellard’s account through unauthorized transactions at the behest of the limited conservator, even though these transactions exceeded the clear limits set forth in a court order,” the award issued Friday states.

The estate asserted that Morgan Stanley breached fiduciary duty, in addition to suitability, know your customer and diligence rules. It also cited breach of contract and negligence, among other causes of action.

A three-person Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc. arbitration panel found Morgan Stanley liable and awarded the Ellard estate $554,834.70 in compensatory damages and $227,438.11 in prejudgment interest.

The arbitrators denied the estate’s request for punitive and treble damages and attorneys’ fees.

The estate had sought $1,238,518 in total compensatory damages, which included $547,082.63 in disbursements and $691,435.67 in prejudgment interest, punitive damages of $2.5 million and post-judgment interest. Morgan Stanley said it was responsible for $154,740 in damages, according to the award.

Morgan Stanley denied the estate’s allegations. It also asked to recover defense costs and sought expungement of the claim from the record of John Rochester, a broker at the firm who was an unnamed party. The arbitrators denied the firm’s claims.

As is typical, the Finra arbitrators did not explain the reasoning behind their decision.

The estate’s attorney, Anthony Fata, did not respond to a request for comment. Morgan Stanley declined to comment.

Related Topics:

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

Wealth firms must prepare for demise of non-competes, despite legal challenges to FTC rule

A growing sentiment against restricting employee moves could affect non-solicitation, too.

FPA, CFP Board diverge on DOL investment advice proposal

While the CFP Board supports the proposal, the FPA has expressed concerns about the DOL rule potentially raising compliance costs for members, increasing the cost of advice and reducing access to advice for some.

Braxton encourages RIAs to see investing in diversity as a business strategy

‘If a firm values its human capital, then it will make an investment to make sure that their talent can flourish for the advancement of the bottom line,’ says Lazetta Rainey Braxton, co-CEO of 2050 Wealth Partners.

Bill chips away at SALT block but comes with drawbacks, advisors say

'I’d love to see the [full] SALT deduction come back but not if it means rates go up,' one advisor says.

Former Morgan Stanley broker running for office reviewing $147K award

Deborah Adeimy claimed firm blocked her from running in GOP primary, aide says 'we're unclear how award figure was calculated.'

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print