DOL encourages investors to ask advisers if they are fiduciaries

Agency provides a litany of questions for consumers as well as FAQs on technical compliance for advisers. <i><b>(More: <a href="&quot;" target="&quot;_blank&quot;" rel="noopener noreferrer">Want to see additional questions? Check out InvestmentNews' list</a>)</i></b>
JAN 13, 2017
Investors should press their financial advisers about whether the advisers are fiduciaries, how much they charge and whether they get paid more based on the investments they recommend, the Labor Department said Friday. In a 16-page document posted on the DOL website, the agency provided a litany of questions for investors to pursue with their advisers based on the requirements of an investment advice rule that will be implemented beginning in April. The DOL also posted Friday a 17-page document containing 35 questions on technical compliance topics that have been raised by financial firms. They cover how investment advice is defined in various interactions with clients and the difference between advice and education, among other areas. These frequently asked questions follow a set of FAQs released Oct. 27 that focused on prohibited transaction exemptions. The regulation requires financial advisers to act in the best interest of their clients in 401(k), individual retirement accounts and other qualified accounts. Among the 22 questions the agency recommends investors ask their advisers: Will you acknowledge in writing that you are a fiduciary when you make investment recommendations to me? What fees and expenses will I be charged? Do you make more money if I buy some investments instead of others? What are your reasons for recommending a rollover from my current plan or IRA? “Best-interest advice is a crucial component of a dynamic, profitable investment marketplace that meets the needs of workers and retirees,” DOL assistant secretary Phyllis Borzi wrote in a note accompanying the FAQs. “The Conflict of Interest Rule offers consumers a new level of confidence when working with investment advisers, and levels the playing field for the many advisers who have been giving best-interest advice all along.” A fiduciary advocate praised the DOL's outreach to consumers. “This is an excellent first cut at boiling 1,000 pages [of the rule] down to 16 pages,” said Knut Rostad, president of the Institute for the Fiduciary Standard. “But one client in 1,000 will read the FAQs. Advisers need to use this document to boil it down to two or three pages that are accessible and meaningful to investors.” Financial industry trade associations are urging the incoming Trump administration to delay the regulation and then work with industry to shape a new fiduciary rule that covers all retail accounts. Opponents assert that the DOL rule is too complex and burdensome and creates litigation risk for advisers that will drive up the cost of advice. Proponents say requiring brokers to act in their clients' best interests is necessary to prevent them from selling high-fee investments that erode retirement savings. Rep. Joe Wilson, R-S.C., recently introduced legislation that would delay the rule for two years. It likely will get through the Republican-controlled House but faces a potential filibuster by Senate Democrats. Given the difficulty of repealing and replacing — or even delaying — a rule that is already effective, it's likely that at least parts of the rule will survive. The FAQs explained for consumers how one of the key provisions of the rule, the so-called best-interest contract, would work. The legally binding agreement allows advisers to charge commissions and collect other revenue that varies by product as long as the adviser agrees to act in the best interests of the client. But the FAQs caution investors that they can't sue their adviser just because an investment loses money. “The best-interest standard focuses on the financial adviser's behavior at the time he or she makes a recommendation to you, rather than how the investment in your retirement account turned out,” the document states. “The adviser's obligation is not perfection, but rather to make recommendations that adhere to a professional standard of care and that are based on your financial interest, without regard to his or her own competing financial interests.”

Latest News

Congress pushes to make fintech oversight offices permanent at SEC, CFTC
Congress pushes to make fintech oversight offices permanent at SEC, CFTC

A new House measure would enshrine FinHub and LabCFTC as permanent fixtures, deepening ties with financial technology sector.

CFP Board names Barry Gersten head technology officer
CFP Board names Barry Gersten head technology officer

The seasoned IT leader arrives as the credentialing body for CFP professionals considers AI's implications for the future of financial planning.

FINRA and advisors' other work
FINRA and advisors' other work

The brokerage industry regulator once again takes a stab at updating rules for independent brokers with other businesses and jobs

Minority capital comes with caution
Minority capital comes with caution

Transactions have slowed according to recent data as industry insider warns that the trip doesn't always match the brochure when minority investors come onboard.

SEC chair says hedge funds may have to submit less data
SEC chair says hedge funds may have to submit less data

Paul Atkins wants agency staff to narrow the scope of filing requirements.

SPONSORED RILAs bring stability, growth during volatile markets

Barely a decade old, registered index-linked annuities have quickly surged in popularity, thanks to their unique blend of protection and growth potential—an appealing option for investors looking to chart a steadier course through today’s choppy market waters, says Myles Lambert, Brighthouse Financial.

SPONSORED Beyond the dashboard: Making wealth tech human

How intelliflo aims to solve advisors' top tech headaches—without sacrificing the personal touch clients crave