John Stumpf, who led
Wells Fargo & Co. through the financial crisis and built it into the world's most valuable bank, stepped down as chief executive officer and chairman, bowing to public outcry over legions of accounts opened by his employees for customers who didn't request them.
Mr. Stumpf, 63, is retiring from both posts effective immediately, the bank said Wednesday in a statement. Tim Sloan, 56, the company's president and chief operating officer, will succeed him as CEO. Lead director Stephen Sanger will serve as the board's non-executive chairman.
“John Stumpf has dedicated his professional life to banking, successfully leading
Wells Fargo through the financial crisis and the largest merger in banking history, and helping to create one of the strongest and most well-known financial services companies in the world,” Mr. Sanger said in the statement. “However, he believes new leadership at this time is appropriate to guide
Wells Fargo through its current challenges.”
Mr. Stumpf leaves
Wells Fargo and its 268,000 employees with a damaged reputation. It has refunded $2.6 million to affected customers and has said it's ending the sales incentives that have been blamed for the abuses. The bank's stock fell as much as 12% after the misdeeds became public, and its subsequent rebound has not been enough for
Wells Fargo to retake the top spot in market value among U.S. banks, which it relinquished to JPMorgan Chase & Co.
It's an ignominious end to a nine-year tenure as CEO that saw
Wells Fargo grow to become the biggest U.S. home lender with returns that were the envy of other bank executives. The profits were driven in part by cross-selling — offering credit cards to customers who opened checking accounts, for example — the strategy that's at the center of the scandal that brought Mr. Stumpf down.
Mr. Stump's unraveling began on Sept. 8, when the U.S.
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau announced that
Wells Fargo had agreed to pay $185 million to settle allegations it secretly opened the unauthorized accounts. Multimillion-dollar settlements have become almost routine in the banking industry, but the brazenness and breadth of the
misconduct struck a nerve.
The U.S. Senate called a hearing, and two weeks later Mr. Stumpf traveled to Washington for an almost three-hour grilling. “I am deeply sorry that we've failed to fulfill on our responsibility to our customers, to our team members and to the American public,” he told the Senate Banking Committee. “I've been through many challenges at Wells Fargo, but none of which pains me more than the one we will discuss this morning.”
Senators took turns berating him. Senator Elizabeth Warren accused him of “gutless leadership” for blaming junior employees.
“You should resign,” the Massachusetts Democrat told Mr. Stumpf. “You should give back the money that you took while this scam was going on and you should be criminally investigated by both the Department of Justice and the Securities and Exchange Commission.”
A week after the hearing, Mr. Stumpf agreed to forgo $41 million in unvested stock that had been granted for performance, as well as some of his salary.
That wasn't enough for Congress. At a second hearing on Sept. 29, called by the House Financial Services Committee, Mr. Stumpf denied there was any organized effort to open unauthorized accounts. Lawmakers suggested the bank should be broken up and called for his arrest.
Wells Fargo “is a criminal enterprise,” said Gregory Meeks, a New York Democrat. “Would you allow someone to walk out after robbing your bank?”
The San Francisco-based bank said it had fired 5,300 employees over the fake accounts. Some low-level bankers came forward, saying they were under intense pressure to meet sales quotas. They said managers told them to do whatever it took to open new accounts, even if customers didn't ask for them.
At Sen. Warren's insistence, the Department of Labor agreed on Sept. 26 to conduct a review of whether the bank violated wage and overtime rules while pushing branch workers to meet aggressive targets. U.S. prosecutors are also investigating, according to a person with knowledge of the matter.
“What you saw from the two hearings was that he came across as really out of touch, not just with what was going on in the bank, but also with the current political environment,” said Brian Kleinhanzl, an analyst at Keefe, Bruyette & Woods in New York. “It was a certain aloofness that he presented, which is not what you wanted to see in that situation. Overall, he completely misread the situation.”
