Finra proposes rules to restrict political contributions by brokers

Finra proposes rules to restrict political contributions by brokers
Regulator is following up on similar rules the SEC put in place for investment advisers.
JUL 20, 2016
Finra has proposed rules restricting some political contributions by brokers to prevent any potential conflicts of interest. And it could play into brokers' activity in the coming election year. The so-called “pay-to-play” rules “would regulate the activities of member firms that engage in distribution or solicitation activities for compensation with government entities on behalf of investment advisers,” according to the proposal. The comment period for the rule extends for 21 days from publication in the Federal Register. Investment advisers already are subject to similar pay-to-play restrictions under rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission in 2010. Language in the SEC rule said the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc. had to follow up with pay-to-play rules for its member firms, according to Amy Lynch, president and founder of FrontLine Compliance. “The broker hired to solicit the government entity must follow these new pay-to-play restrictions under this new rule, which is basically identical to the ones the SEC wrote for advisers,” Ms. Lynch said. “There's really no difference.” The rule would put in place contribution caps of $350 in an election year and $150 in a non-election year for brokers. In the event a broker accidentally exceeds the caps, there is no penalty as long as a refund is received within a four-month period of receipt of the donation. Brokers who don't meet these exemptions are unable to solicit a government official or entity for business within a two-year period of the donation. Depending on when the rule is finalized, the regulation could affect brokers' political contributions in the 2016 election cycle. The SEC rule changed how adviser advocacy organizations raised and donated money in the 2012 election year. “I think it's not a coincidence [Finra] finally got the rule out and next year is an election year,” Ms. Lynch said. Brokerages will need to ensure they have adequate record-keeping systems in place to address the rules, according to Susan Grafton, partner at Dechert. “Brokers will need procedures for tracking their associated persons' contributions. The rule imposes additional record-keeping requirements and there will be a need for additional training of personnel, because a lot of pay-to-play violations happen inadvertently,” Ms. Grafton said. Because Finra's pay-to-play proposal is stipulated by the SEC's rule-making endeavor, many brokerage firms are likely already in compliance with the proposed regulation, according to Ms. Lynch. “Many firms have already gone ahead and adopted their own guidelines that already meet their requirement because they knew this was coming,” Ms. Lynch said. Where firms could fall short is the maintenance of a prospect list identifying parties being solicited in order to flag when solicitation of a government entity is taking place, Ms. Lynch said.

Latest News

Why uncertainty is making behavioral coaching more valuable than ever
Why uncertainty is making behavioral coaching more valuable than ever

Markets have always been unpredictable. What has changed is the amount of information investors are trying to process and the growing role advisors play in helping clients avoid emotional decisions

Florida investor hits real estate syndicator with fraud suit over $750K
Florida investor hits real estate syndicator with fraud suit over $750K

Six apartment deals, one "big account," and $2.7M in undocumented insider loans. Now the lawsuit lands

Chicago’s 'Mr. Finance' posed as advisor in loan scheme, according to Illinois regulators
Chicago’s 'Mr. Finance' posed as advisor in loan scheme, according to Illinois regulators

The Illinois order refers to Brandon Ellington’s investment program as a “Ponzi-like scheme.”

Bezos calls for zero income tax on bottom half of earners
Bezos calls for zero income tax on bottom half of earners

But the Amazon executive chair seems to want it both ways, arguing that taxing the ultra-wealthy won't help struggling Americans.

Why the Charity Parity Act matters for retired clients in 401(k)s
Why the Charity Parity Act matters for retired clients in 401(k)s

Northern Trust planning leader sees the bill extending qualified charitable distributions to employer plans as a potential positive step — but advisors shouldn't overlook bigger holes in the strategy.

SPONSORED Beyond wealth management: Why the future of advice is becoming more human

As technical expertise becomes increasingly commoditized, advisors who can integrate strategy, relationships, and specialized expertise into a cohesive client experience will define the next era of wealth management

SPONSORED Durability over scale: What actually defines a great advisory firm

Growth may get the headlines, but in my experience, longevity is earned through structure, culture, and discipline