The ‘best’ way to pay for advice

The ‘best’ way to pay for advice
An adviser who’s honest and transparent about compensation, regardless of the model, is bound to engender the trust that advice seekers want most of all.
OCT 10, 2022

In describing their value and expertise, financial advisers often compare themselves to accountants and attorneys. But the way advisers are paid for their services usually is very different from how those other professionals are compensated.

Notably, financial clients rarely expect to receive a bill for meeting with their adviser. Instead, commissions, fees for managing assets and flat fees are the norm, not hourly rates — a pattern resulting from regulation, custom and client preference. Is there a “best” compensation arrangement that most closely adheres to a fiduciary standard?

Three registered investment advisers debated that issue in a panel discussion at a recent Institute for the Fiduciary Standard event. As reported by technology editor Ryan W. Neal, the advisers explained why their particular model — one an AUM fee for clients who want investment management, plus flat fees for those who want financial advice only; one a flat fee; and one based on an hourly fee — best suits clients.

The advisers explained how their fee structure addresses potential conflicts. Hourly fees, for example, may be in the best interest of clients who don’t want a long-term relationship, just help with a particular problem. An AUM approach may be best for those wanting long-term advice and expert advice on complex investments. On the other hand, it may not be best for those who need and want more help with financial planning than with asset management.

CUSTOMER DEMAND

Clearly, the need to meet customer demand is driving advisers to choose a preferred compensation approach. But let’s not forget regulation, which has been setting the ground rules for advice and compensation since the 1930s and 1940s. Regulation Best Interest is but the latest attempt to get “best” right, especially as that applies to mitigating conflicts surrounding advice. Many believe there is still more to be done.

But rather than go down the seemingly bottomless rabbit hole of seeking out the “best,” whether in conflict elimination or compensation, maybe it’s time to concede that conflicts will always exist and that no one compensation approach is always “best.” What’s more, any of several approaches may be optimal in a particular situation if an adviser is completely forthcoming and transparent with clients about why a particular type of compensation is being used, how rks and how much the adviser is making. Disclosure of all that should be short and in plain English, not 30 pages of incomprehensible boilerplate that no one reads or understands because it’s written by lawyers to cover everyone’s hindquarters, not to communicate.

With inflation raging, a recession on the horizon and markets skittish, to say the least, investors need trustworthy advisers more than ever. An adviser who’s honest and transparent about compensation, regardless of the model, and who truly puts the client first beyond the requirements of regulation is bound to engender the trust that advice seekers want most of all.

NASAA leader puts nontraded REITs, adviser fees, Reg BI at top of agenda

Latest News

March Madness special: Should financial advisors let their clients pick longshots?
March Madness special: Should financial advisors let their clients pick longshots?

Taking home first prize in an NCAA tournament pool often requires picking longshots and upsets. The same might be said for winning in the stock market.

'We have something special here'
'We have something special here'

Janney Montgomery Scott's president and CEO tells IN about the firm's acquisition by KKR, the equity ownership arrangement for all its advisor employees, and how it plans to continue for another 200 years.

Bridgewater's flagship hedge fund surges amid volatile markets
Bridgewater's flagship hedge fund surges amid volatile markets

The firm's flagship fund, which invests in stocks, bonds, currencies, and commodities, saw accelerated gains as some peers lost ground.

ICI floats '40 Act revamp to support middle-class wealth creation
ICI floats '40 Act revamp to support middle-class wealth creation

Policy proposal offers recommendations on dual-share class funds, semi-transparent ETFs, and expanded flexibility for closed-end funds to include private market assets.

Trump-induced turbulence tests 60-40 strategy's limits
Trump-induced turbulence tests 60-40 strategy's limits

With bonds failing to provide a safety net for steeply falling stock prices, many investors are letting go of their "set it and forget it" approach.

SPONSORED Beyond the all-in-one: Why specialization is key in wealth tech

In an industry of broad solutions, firms like intelliflo prove 'you just need tools that play well together'

SPONSORED Record growth: Interval funds emerge as key players in alternative investments

Blue Vault Alts Summit highlights the role of liquidity-focused funds in reshaping advisor strategies