The one benefit employers won't touch

Companies are cutting back on every conceivable employee benefit – except medical coverage for dependents
AUG 22, 2011
As businesses struggle to recover from the recession, they are cutting back on employee benefits – except for ‘third-rail' benefits that most don't dare touch. That's according to a survey of around 156 business executives conducted in February through May by benefits consulting firm Corporate Synergies Group and the Financial Executive Research Foundation. Executives reported that they are increasing the employee's share of the cost for several components of their benefits packages and cutting back others. The reason? What else – concern over rising costs. The shifting of the benefits burden over the last five years includes increased co-pays and/or deductibles (88%), high-deductible plans or health savings accounts (42%), and reduced coverage levels (38%). Dependent coverage, however, is the big untouchable. Indeed, only 2% of employers said they had dared to tread there, even as 21% said they have reduced or eliminated salary increases and/or bonuses for employees in order to continue offering medical coverage as costs continue to surge. Employers were a bit more willing to cut back on non-medical employee benefits, with 9% saying they had done that. Not surprisingly, employers are attempting to match the benefits their competitors offer in order to retain their best employees, the executives said. But the report added that “most are looking to cut where their competitors are cutting as well.” Self-insuring remains popular, particularly with larger firms. Among firms with more than 500 employees, 79% said they provide medical benefits through self-insurance. Almost half of the surveyed companies self-insure, and 8% have moved to self-insurance within the past five years. Employees are doing their best to cope with their rising share of the cost of insurance. The most popular route is to move to a higher deductible plan (60%), while only 11% dropped their dependents from coverage.

Latest News

Newsom wants nationwide billionaires tax as presidential bid may loom on the horizon
Newsom wants nationwide billionaires tax as presidential bid may loom on the horizon

“It’s time for an economic reset,” wrote the California governor, in a post on X.

Maryland regulators spank fledgling art-focused RIA Masterworks over registration snafus
Maryland regulators spank fledgling art-focused RIA Masterworks over registration snafus

Masterworks was launched in 2017 but its RIA, Masterworks Advisers, is just three years old.

Investors allege Miami operator took over $1.5 million in EB-5 scheme
Investors allege Miami operator took over $1.5 million in EB-5 scheme

One 2017 form, no broker license, and a $42 million gap they say surfaced on a webinar.

Gen X, millennials lag in retirement confidence amid knowledge gap
Gen X, millennials lag in retirement confidence amid knowledge gap

Fewer than half of Americans in their peak earning years feel on track for retirement, while many say limited financial knowledge and access to professional guidance are holding them back.

Advisor moves: Veteran-led UBS team overseeing $460 million migrates to Merrill
Advisor moves: Veteran-led UBS team overseeing $460 million migrates to Merrill

Meanwhile, Wells Fargo hauled advisors overseeing $825 million in the West Coast, while Wedbush has welcomed a seasoned professional from Stifel in California.

SPONSORED Who builds the income when the pension disappears?

Dan Biagini of American Equity says the steady decline of pensions, longer lifespans and a reset in interest rates are rewriting how advisors build retirement income

SPONSORED Why direct indexing stopped being optional

Direct indexing is on pace to outgrow ETFs and mutual funds. Northern Trust's Ken Lassner explains why the advisors who get it wish they had started sooner.