Two Provident execs hit with fines, bans

JUN 03, 2012
Two co-founders of Provident Royalties LLC, which turned out to be a $485 million Ponzi scheme that caused severe losses for investors and wiped out dozens of independent broker-dealers, have been fined $50,000 each and suspended from the securities industry for two years, according to a settlement with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc. The two executives, Brendan Coughlin and Henry Harrison, also were managing partners of Provident Asset Management LLC, the wholesaling broker-dealer that distributed a series of Provident Royalties private placements, and therefore are under Finra's jurisdiction.

OIL-AND-GAS INTERESTS

About 60 broker-dealers and investment advisory firms sold the Provident deals, which promised annual returns of up to 18%. The money raised for the offerings between 2006 and 2009 was supposed to be used to purchase oil-and-gas interests such as real estate, leases and mineral rights. Twenty-seven of the firms that sold Provident private placements have since shut down, according to a review of Finra's BrokerCheck system, many failing because of the cost of investor lawsuits and complaints stemming from the fraudulent Provident private placements. According to the Finra order of settlement, which was submitted by Mr. Coughlin and Mr. Harrison in April, and accepted by Finra's National Adjudicatory Council and Office of Disciplinary Affairs, the two executives failed to make various disclosures regarding where the money came from for payments and distributions to investors in the private placements. They also failed to disclose the extent of the involvement of Provident co-founder Joseph Blim- line, who was convicted of running two oil-and-gas Ponzi schemes, including Provident, between 2003 and 2009, according to the Justice Department. Under the settlement, Mr. Coughlin and Mr. Harrison didn't admit to or deny any Finra allegations. Their attorney, John Carney, could not be reached for comment last week.

"SLAP ON THE WRIST'

To some, Finra's settlement with the two ex-Provident executives falls short, considering the scope and damage of the Provident fraud. In July 2009, the Securities and Exchange Commission said that Provident was a Ponzi scheme that affected 7,700 investors. “The punishment should fit the crime, and this doesn't. In my view, suspensions are the ultimate slap on the wrist,” said Philip Aidikoff, a plaintiff's attorney and partner at Aidikoff Uhl & Bakhtiari. “When someone engages in this type of conduct, they should be barred from the industry for life,” he said. “The people who engineer [the investment product] and distribute it can always go back out and sell this kind of stuff again.” His firm represented investors with more than $1 million in claims against broker-dealers that sold Provident preferred shares, Mr. Aidikoff said. “Based on my knowledge of this deal, it's a travesty that these guys weren't barred from the industry,” he said. Others disagree, saying that the penalty is significant and not just a slap on the wrist. “A two-year suspension is typically the maximum penalty Finra will consider, short of being barred,” said Jeffrey Zeisman, a former Finra attorney now with Bryan Cave LLP. Mr. Coughlin and Mr. Harrison are “functionally barred” from the securities industry, he said. Neither has worked at a broker-dealer since the Provident matter was revealed in 2009, and the earliest that they will be able once more to work in the securities industry is 2014. “It's going to be virtually impossible for them to re-enter the business,” Mr. Zeisman said.

20-YEAR SENTENCE

The settlement, which was finalized May 25, is in stark contrast to the 20-year prison sentence that Mr. Blimline received earlier last month in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas. He received millions of dollars in unsecured loans from investor funds and also directed the purchase by Provident of worthless assets from an earlier Ponzi scheme, which was based in Michigan, according to a statement by the Justice Department. “In the Provident scheme, funds from later investors were also consistently used to make payments to early investors, resulting in the collapse of the scheme in 2009,” the Justice Department said. Mr. Coughlin and Mr. Harrison weren't criminally charged. The SEC filed a civil suit against the two in July 2009. That matter has been settled, but the details haven't yet been released. The settlement between Finra, Mr. Coughlin and Mr. Harrison also imposes a monetary penalty much lower than the millions in restitution that several broker-dealers have paid to investors who bought Provident preferred stock. Next Financial Group Inc. alone has paid $2 million in restitution to clients as part of a Finra settlement. That firm's chief executive, Barry Knight, declined to comment. [email protected]

Latest News

The 2025 InvestmentNews Awards Excellence Awardees revealed
The 2025 InvestmentNews Awards Excellence Awardees revealed

From outstanding individuals to innovative organizations, find out who made the final shortlist for top honors at the IN awards, now in its second year.

Top RIA Cresset warns of 'inevitable' recession amid tariff uncertainty
Top RIA Cresset warns of 'inevitable' recession amid tariff uncertainty

Cresset's Susie Cranston is expecting an economic recession, but says her $65 billion RIA sees "great opportunity" to keep investing in a down market.

Edward Jones joins the crowd to sell more alternative investments
Edward Jones joins the crowd to sell more alternative investments

“There’s a big pull to alternative investments right now because of volatility of the stock market,” Kevin Gannon, CEO of Robert A. Stanger & Co., said.

Record RIA M&A activity marks strong start to 2025
Record RIA M&A activity marks strong start to 2025

Sellers shift focus: It's not about succession anymore.

IB+ Data Hub offers strategic edge for U.S. wealth advisors and RIAs advising business clients
IB+ Data Hub offers strategic edge for U.S. wealth advisors and RIAs advising business clients

Platform being adopted by independent-minded advisors who see insurance as a core pillar of their business.

SPONSORED Compliance in real time: Technology's expanding role in RIA oversight

RIAs face rising regulatory pressure in 2025. Forward-looking firms are responding with embedded technology, not more paperwork.

SPONSORED Advisory firms confront crossroads amid historic wealth transfer

As inheritances are set to reshape client portfolios and next-gen heirs demand digital-first experiences, firms are retooling their wealth tech stacks and succession models in real time.