Backed-up SEC won't address mandatory arb any time soon

Mandatory arbitration has been generating plenty of headlines lately, but SEC Commissioner Elisse Walter says the regulator won't be addressing the subject any time soon.
JUN 30, 2013
Although state securities regulators and some lawmakers are pushing the Securities and Exchange commission to end or modify mandatory arbitration clauses in brokerage contracts, the agency won't be taking action on the issue any time soon. SEC Commissioner Elisse Walter said today that there are too many other mandatory rulemakings that the SEC must address, including provisions in the Dodd-Frank financial reform law and a separate law – the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act -- that aims to ease securities regulations for small firms. The Dodd-Frank measure gave the SEC the authority to reform mandatory arbitration, which is included in nearly every brokerage contract. “It's not going to happen in the next few months or this year because there is so much we have left to do under Dodd-Frank and the JOBS Act – and we have to deal with money market funds and a few other things that by virtue of market interest really are ahead of all of this,” Ms. Walter told an audience at the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc. conference in Washington. State securities regulators and some lawmakers argue that giving small investors the option of going to court with their claims would be fairer to them. Proponents of arbitration assert that it is the most cost-effective and efficient way to adjudicate claims. Last week, The Charles Schwab Corp. removed from its client contracts a clause that prevents them from filing class-action suits against the broker. Finra brought charges against Schwab last year, claiming that the company's arbitration agreement violated its rules that ensure customers can join a court-filed class action case instead of arbitration. But a Finra hearing panel in February ruled in Schwab's favor, saying that the Federal Arbitration Act prevented Finra from enforcing those rules. Finra appealed the decision to its internal appeals board, the National Adjudicatory Council, where the case is pending and expected to be heard in September. Although state securities regulators and some lawmakers are pushing the Securities and Exchange commission to end or modify mandatory arbitration clauses in brokerage contracts, the agency won't be taking action on the issue any time soon. SEC Commissioner Elisse Walter said on Monday that there are too many other mandatory rulemakings that the SEC must address, including provisions from the Dodd-Frank financial reform law and a separate law — the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act — that aims to ease securities regulations for small firms. The Dodd-Frank measure gave the SEC the authority to reform mandatory arbitration, which is included in nearly every brokerage contract. “It's not going to happen in the next few months or this year because there is so much we have left to do under Dodd-Frank and the JOBS Act – and we have to deal with money market funds and a few other things that by virtue of market interest really are ahead of all of this,” Ms. Walter told an audience at the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc. conference in Washington. State securities regulators and some lawmakers argue that giving small investors the option of going to court with their claims would be fairer to them. Proponents of arbitration assert that industry panels are the most cost-effective and efficient way to adjudicate claims. Last week, The Charles Schwab Corp. removed from its client contracts a clause that prevents them from filing class-action suits against the broker. Finra brought charges against Schwab last year, claiming that the company's arbitration agreement violated its rules that ensure customers can join a court-filed class action case instead of arbitration. But a Finra hearing panel in February ruled in Schwab's favor, saying that the Federal Arbitration Act prevented Finra from enforcing those rules. Finra appealed the decision to its internal appeals board, the National Adjudicatory Council, or NAC, where the case is pending and expected to be heard in September. Ms. Walter said the SEC should consider the issue at some point. “I personally do think it's something to take a hard look at,” Ms. Walter said. “I don't know when the commission will be able to find the time to do it.”

Latest News

Easy to buy, harder to exit: The liquidity risk hidden inside ETFs
Easy to buy, harder to exit: The liquidity risk hidden inside ETFs

Getting a client into a fund has never been easier – but after that, the hardest part is yet to come.

FINRA bars NYLIFE rep who used smart glasses to cheat on Series 6
FINRA bars NYLIFE rep who used smart glasses to cheat on Series 6

A former NYLIFE Securities rep was permanently barred after using internet-enabled glasses to cheat on the Series 6 exam

Vanguard settled Just Invest lawsuit weeks before Altruist deal
Vanguard settled Just Invest lawsuit weeks before Altruist deal

Both of Vanguard's acquisitions have targeted the RIA industry, but the first ended in a legal settlement just weeks before buying Altruist.

Ex-Raymond James duo launch Proxima on Concurrent's platform
Ex-Raymond James duo launch Proxima on Concurrent's platform

Chris Davitt and Anupam Singh bring institutional recruiting muscle to a firm built for advisors chasing equity and independence.

Osaic names Sayee Bellamkonda as first chief AI and technology officer
Osaic names Sayee Bellamkonda as first chief AI and technology officer

Appointment continues a wave of AI leadership hires reshaping wealth management as advisory firms race to build out digital and data infrastructure.

SPONSORED Direct indexing webinar targets tax-loss harvesting amid market swings

Northern Trust’s Ken Lassner shows advisors how to convert volatility into after-tax portfolio gains

SPONSORED Who builds the income when the pension disappears?

Dan Biagini of American Equity says the steady decline of pensions, longer lifespans and a reset in interest rates are rewriting how advisors build retirement income