Insider-trading rule needed to restore trust: Lawmakers

Insider-trading rule needed to restore trust: Lawmakers
New restrictions on insider-trading by U.S. lawmakers are needed to help lift waning public trust in Congress.
DEC 07, 2011
New restrictions on insider-trading by U.S. lawmakers are needed to help lift waning public trust in Congress, said Democrats and Republicans on the House Financial Services Committee. “This is about restoring faith,” said Representative Tim Walz, a Minnesota Democrat sponsoring legislation to explicitly ban such trading. “If you think 9 percent approval rating is bad, don't do anything, drag it out and watch what happens,” he said referring to polling on Americans' approval of Congress. There's a public perception that lawmakers are benefiting from non-public information whether they are or not, he said. Previous efforts to pass restrictions haven't advanced in Congress. The issue re-emerged after a report last month by the CBS News program “60 Minutes,” which said members of Congress bought stock in companies during debates on legislation that might affect the businesses. None of the questioned investments was illegal, the report said. “It is absolutely essential that we do restore the public's trust,” said Representative Spencer Bachus, an Alabama Republican and chairman of the financial services panel. “If this is the answer, so be it.” Bachus was among the lawmakers mentioned in the “60 Minutes” report. The program said that during the 2008 financial crisis, Bachus -- then the ranking Republican on the Financial Services Committee -- bet stock prices would fall while being privately briefed that a global financial meltdown might be imminent. Reporting Requirement In a statement at the time, Bachus's office said he never trades on non-public information. The CBS report sparked interest by lawmakers in legislation first introduced in 2006 by Representative Louise Slaughter, a New York Democrat. That measure was re-introduced this year by Walz. It would label as securities fraud any trading on legislative information by lawmakers or their staff members. The bill would require any trade of more than $1,000 to be reported within 90 days. The bill would require regulators to draft rules barring individuals and so-called political intelligence firms, which use their contacts in Washington to provide financial firms with market-related information, from selling non-public information obtained from federal employees. It also would require firms or individuals involved in political intelligence to register in the same way as federal lobbyists. ‘First Step' “We're living in a time when Americans do not trust Congress,” said Representative Walter Jones, a North Carolina Republican co-sponsoring the measure. “It is a proper first step in maintaining the integrity of Congress.” The Senate's Homeland Security Committee is examining bipartisan proposals to restrict certain trading by lawmakers and their aides, who often have access to nonpublic information as part of their legislative and oversight duties. The chairmen of the House and Senate panels said they would move ahead with the measures and bring them to a committee vote. Representative Sean Duffy, a freshman Republican from Wisconsin, said the measure should go a step further. He introduced legislation that would require members of Congress to establish a blind trust for all of their stock holdings. If they don't, lawmakers would have to disclose their stock trades within three days. “There is a cloud over members of Congress and the trades they make,” he said. “The American people want sunshine.” --Bloomberg News--

Latest News

Osaic executives Kristy Britt and Greg Cornick to leave
Osaic executives Kristy Britt and Greg Cornick to leave

The firm's CFO and EVP of Wealth Management Solutions are the latest executives to exit the broker-dealer.

Estate planning becomes a client retention issue for financial advisors, survey finds
Estate planning becomes a client retention issue for financial advisors, survey finds

Clients are saying they would consider switching advisors if another professional offered estate planning services, according to a new Trust & Will survey.

Candidly adds AI agents for Trump Accounts, workplace benefits
Candidly adds AI agents for Trump Accounts, workplace benefits

CEO Laurel Taylor says the fintech's composable AI stack helps workers optimize dollars across Trump Accounts, 529s, 401(k)s, and other employee benefits.

BMO adds three advisors in Dallas amid Y'all Street wealth boom
BMO adds three advisors in Dallas amid Y'all Street wealth boom

The bank has swiped three private banking veterans from BNY as the city climbs the ranks of America's fastest-growing wealth hubs.

UBS moves toward full-service US bank as plans to extend wealth business
UBS moves toward full-service US bank as plans to extend wealth business

Employee accounts, crypto trials and job cuts frame a pivotal year for the Swiss lender.

SPONSORED Who builds the income when the pension disappears?

Dan Biagini of American Equity says the steady decline of pensions, longer lifespans and a reset in interest rates are rewriting how advisors build retirement income

SPONSORED Why direct indexing stopped being optional

Direct indexing is on pace to outgrow ETFs and mutual funds. Northern Trust's Ken Lassner explains why the advisors who get it wish they had started sooner.