New Jersey pulls license of ex-LPL broker

New Jersey pulls license of ex-LPL broker
“The numbers are wrong," says broker, who made $1.5 million after guiding clients to invest in friend’s firm, according to the Bureau of Securities.
OCT 07, 2024

A former broker in New Jersey with LPL Financial, Carlos Leston, had his registration revoked last week by the state’s Bureau of Securities for recommending and selling unsuitable, high-risk investments to elderly clients that were not in their best interest, benefited him financially, and resulted in financial losses for them, according to the state regulator.

Leston, of Maywood, N.J., offered and sold two elderly clients a total of $3.65 million in securities in a New York lending company, without disclosing that the CEO of the corporation was a friend of his who had been barred from the securities industry, according to the Bureau of Securities in a statement from October 1.

Leston also did not disclose that he had a “referral arrangement” with the lending company and was compensated more than $1.5 million by the company.

Reached by phone on Monday, Leston said the amount of commissions generated by the sales of the investments in questions was far less.

“The numbers are wrong, the $1.5 million in commissions is wrong,” Leston said. “It’s a fraction of that. It’s not even close to that.”

Anthony Varbero, Leston’s attorney, said the $1.5 million in commissions paid is “unequivocally incorrect and false.” He added that there was another advisor, who was an attorney and a CFP, also aware of these transactions. 

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc. two year ago barred Leston from the securities industry after refusing to cooperate in a Finra investigation into his practice. A 22-year industry veteran, Leston worked as an LPL broker from 2008 to 2022.

According to his BrokerCheck report, Leston has been named in one securities complaint involving the sale of promissory notes to clients that was settled this year for $165,000.

“On Leston’s recommendation, the elderly clients liquidated existing insurance annuities they relied on for steady incomes and used the proceeds to purchase the investments, which were neither suitable nor in their best interest,” according to the statement by the Bureau of Securities. “As a result of the full or partial surrenders of their annuity contracts, the clients incurred losses, taxes, and surrender charges that exceeded any potential benefit of purchasing the lending company securities.”

“The transactions violated numerous policies and procedures in place at the broker-dealer, including those mandating that agents comply with Regulation Best Interest, a federal rule that requires broker-dealers to act in the best interest of their retail customers when making recommendations about securities transactions or investment strategies,” according to the statement by the Bureau of Securities.

Latest News

WallStreetBets takes on the SEC — and makes a surprisingly sharp case
WallStreetBets takes on the SEC — and makes a surprisingly sharp case

The Reddit trading community's formal comment letter against the proposal is drawing widespread attention across finance and tech circles.

Stratos Wealth Holdings closes 11 acquisitions in push for advisory scale
Stratos Wealth Holdings closes 11 acquisitions in push for advisory scale

RIA aggregator adds $4.8 billion in client assets across seven states as demand grows for alternatives to traditional succession models.

Beyond wealth management: Why the future of advice is becoming more human
Beyond wealth management: Why the future of advice is becoming more human

As technical expertise becomes increasingly commoditized, advisors who can integrate strategy, relationships, and specialized expertise into a cohesive client experience will define the next era of wealth management

Shareholder sues FS KKR Capital board, alleges NAV and dividend cover-up
Shareholder sues FS KKR Capital board, alleges NAV and dividend cover-up

Shareholder targets FS KKR Capital's directors over alleged portfolio valuation and dividend missteps.

UBS loses $1.2 million arbitration claim linked to variable annuities and margin
UBS loses $1.2 million arbitration claim linked to variable annuities and margin

UBS has a history of costly litigation stemming from the sale of volatile investment products.

SPONSORED Beyond wealth management: Why the future of advice is becoming more human

As technical expertise becomes increasingly commoditized, advisors who can integrate strategy, relationships, and specialized expertise into a cohesive client experience will define the next era of wealth management

SPONSORED Durability over scale: What actually defines a great advisory firm

Growth may get the headlines, but in my experience, longevity is earned through structure, culture, and discipline