Supreme Court curbs SEC's power to recoup illegal profits

The SEC extracted almost $3 billion in disgorgement payments in 2016.
JUN 05, 2017

The U.S. Supreme Court put sharp new limits on a favorite tool used by securities regulators to recoup money from people found to have violated federal laws. The justices unanimously said the Securities and Exchange Commission is bound by a five-year statute of limitations when it seeks "disgorgement," or the return of illegal profits. Lower courts had been divided on the issue. The SEC extracted almost $3 billion in disgorgement payments in 2016 — more than double what it collected in other types of penalties. (More: SEC reasserts itself on investment-advice standards, but it's not clear whether it will overtake DOL fiduciary rule) The ruling is a victory for Charles R. Kokesh, a New Mexico man found by a jury to have misappropriated money from four investment companies he controlled. A judge ordered him to pay a $2.4 million civil penalty, plus $35 million in disgorgement, equal to the amount he was found to have misappropriated dating back to 1995. An appeals court ruled against Mr. Kokesh. Mr. Kokesh said the SEC should be able to collect only $5 million in disgorgement, the amount attributable to the five-year period before the agency filed its claims in 2009. The legal provision that establishes the five-year statute of limitations doesn't explicitly mention disgorgement. It says it applies to "enforcement of any civil fine, penalty or forfeiture." The Justice Department argued that disgorgement is different than those sanctions because it isn't a punishment and instead is focused on ensuring a violator doesn't profit from illegal conduct. (More: Critics say Finra proposal on unpaid arbitration awards doesn't go far enough) Writing for the Supreme Court, Justice Sonia Sotomayor said disgorgement "bears all the hallmarks of a penalty." She noted that only some of the money collected by the SEC goes to the victims and that some of the funds end up with the Treasury. "It is imposed as a consequence of violating a public law and it is intended to deter, not to compensate," Sotomayor wrote in the 11-page ruling. The case is Kokesh v. SEC, 16-529.

Latest News

Americans back sharing AI wealth as debate over industry’s economic benefits grows
Americans back sharing AI wealth as debate over industry’s economic benefits grows

Public support grows for policies that spread AI’s financial gains beyond tech companies.

JPMorgan's record Q2 profit rides trading and dealmaking surge
JPMorgan's record Q2 profit rides trading and dealmaking surge

Investment banking fees rose 30% on a wave of IPOs and megadeals, led by the largest public listing on record.

Feathery raises $30 million to power AI-driven RIA operations
Feathery raises $30 million to power AI-driven RIA operations

Series A funding from Portage, Bain Capital, and other investors will fuel data tools designed to speed advisor transitions and cut onboarding delays across wealth firms.

Wealth Enhancement deepens East Coast presence with Wealthshield deal
Wealth Enhancement deepens East Coast presence with Wealthshield deal

The Minneapolis-based RIA aggregator is adding two North Carolina practices managing nearly $1 billion, pushing its total client assets past $158.2 billion.

The real reason I expanded my RIA to Hong Kong (it wasn't for the AUM)
The real reason I expanded my RIA to Hong Kong (it wasn't for the AUM)

As markets disintegrate, the value of on-the-ground, first-hand research through "intimate knowledge acquisition" is skyrocketing.

SPONSORED Direct indexing webinar targets tax-loss harvesting amid market swings

Northern Trust’s Ken Lassner shows advisors how to convert volatility into after-tax portfolio gains

SPONSORED Who builds the income when the pension disappears?

Dan Biagini of American Equity says the steady decline of pensions, longer lifespans and a reset in interest rates are rewriting how advisors build retirement income