Higher earnings limit applies at 66

SEP 04, 2013
My recent column on how the Social Security earnings cap is applied during the first year of retirement triggered several more questions. Normally, people who collect Social Security benefits before the full retirement age of 66 must forfeit $1 in benefits for every $2 earned over a prescribed limit. For this year, the earnings cap is $15,120. It is important to note that these benefit reductions aren't truly lost but merely deferred. Benefits will be increased at full retirement age to account for benefits that were withheld due to earnings. So, say an individual collected benefits at 62 and ultimately forfeited 12 months' worth of benefits over the next four years. Once that person reached full retirement age, Social Security would recalculate the benefits as if their collection began at 63, instead of 62, resulting in a higher amount going forward.

ONE-YEAR RULE

As I noted in my recent column, there is a special one-year rule that applies to earnings during the first year of retirement. Under this rule, an individual can get a full Social Security check for any whole month a person is retired, regardless of the yearly earnings prior to claiming benefits. For 2013, a person who is younger than full retirement age for the entire year is considered retired if his or her monthly earnings are $1,260 or less. The monthly limit is 1/12th of the 2013 annual earnings limit of $15,120. For example, John Smith retires at 62 on Oct. 30, 2013, after he earned $45,000 through October. Beginning in November, he takes a part-time job earning $500 per month. Although Mr. Smith's earnings for the year substantially exceeded the 2013 annual limit of $15,120, he will receive a Social Security payment for November and December because his earnings in those months are less than $1,260, the monthly limit for people younger than full retirement age. Beginning in 2014, only the yearly limit would apply to him. If an individual reaches full retirement age during 2013, Social Security applies a more generous earnings test. It deducts $1 in benefits for every $3 earned above a higher limit — $40,080 — until the month full retirement age is reached. That prompted Larry Hilkemann, an accountant from Norfolk, Neb., to ask me in an e-mail, “Does that first-year rule also apply to the year you qualify for full benefits at age 66? Therefore, can you earn up to $3,340 per month after you start taking benefits in the year you turn 66?” That amount is 1/12th of the higher annual earnings cap of $40,080 that applies to workers who turn 66 this year. Yes, in the first year of retirement, Social Security will compute an individual's payments using both the annual and monthly limits. The individual will be paid using whichever method is best for him or her. Once that individual reaches full retirement age, the earnings restrictions disappear completely. Here is an example of how the earnings test applies to someone who turns 66 this year. I have taken it directly from the Social Security publication “How Work Affects Your Benefits.” Let's say an individual will turn 66 in November. That person will have filed for Social Security in January 2013 — 10 months before his or her 66th birthday — and is entitled to benefits of $600 per month.

WITHHOLDING PAYMENTS

The individual expects to earn $41,580 from January through October. That is $1,500 above the annual earnings limit of $40,080 for people who turn 66 this year. During that period, Social Security would withhold $500 in benefits — $1 for every $3 earned over the limit ($1,500/3 = $500) — in the months leading up to the 66th birthday. To do this, Social Security would withhold all the payments until the full earnings cap reduction is satisfied. In the above example, that means that the person's first $600 benefit check of the year would be withheld to satisfy the entire earnings test reduction. Then, beginning in February 2013, the person would have received his or her normal $600 benefit, and would be paid that amount each month for the remainder of the year. The individual would receive the remaining $100 (the excess amount withheld from the first check, $600-$500 = $100) in January 2014.

Latest News

Texas man says SEC and fund could make him pay twice
Texas man says SEC and fund could make him pay twice

A $141M judgment and a federal asset freeze collide over one shrinking pool

Osaic executives Kristy Britt and Greg Cornick to leave
Osaic executives Kristy Britt and Greg Cornick to leave

The firm's CFO and EVP of Wealth Management Solutions are the latest executives to exit the broker-dealer.

Estate planning becomes a client retention issue for financial advisors, survey finds
Estate planning becomes a client retention issue for financial advisors, survey finds

Clients are saying they would consider switching advisors if another professional offered estate planning services, according to a new Trust & Will survey.

Candidly adds AI agents for Trump Accounts, workplace benefits
Candidly adds AI agents for Trump Accounts, workplace benefits

CEO Laurel Taylor says the fintech's composable AI stack helps workers optimize dollars across Trump Accounts, 529s, 401(k)s, and other employee benefits.

BMO adds three advisors in Dallas amid Y'all Street wealth boom
BMO adds three advisors in Dallas amid Y'all Street wealth boom

The bank has swiped three private banking veterans from BNY as the city climbs the ranks of America's fastest-growing wealth hubs.

SPONSORED Who builds the income when the pension disappears?

Dan Biagini of American Equity says the steady decline of pensions, longer lifespans and a reset in interest rates are rewriting how advisors build retirement income

SPONSORED Why direct indexing stopped being optional

Direct indexing is on pace to outgrow ETFs and mutual funds. Northern Trust's Ken Lassner explains why the advisors who get it wish they had started sooner.