Mutual of Omaha has agreed to settle a lawsuit brought by its own retirement plan participants for $6.7 million, court records filed this week show.
The firm, along with its United of Omaha Life Insurance Company subsidiary, was sued in early 2018. The plaintiffs in the class-action case alleged that the firms mismanaged their 401(k) plans by choosing United as an investment and administrative provider, and consequently receiving excessive revenue from plan participants.
The companies allegedly engaged in self-dealing, as a separate account in the plans charged additional fees beyond the costs of the underlying mutual funds, court records state. Further, the guaranteed interest account in the plan’s general account was provided by United, rather than an unconflicted third party, the plaintiffs wrote.
Mutual of Omaha and United disputed the allegations in court. The settlement helps avoid further expense and burden of ongoing litigation, a company spokesperson wrote in an email.
“As the settlement agreement indicates, Mutual of Omaha denies all allegations of wrongdoing asserted in this lawsuit,” the statement read. “By settling the case, money that would have been spent to cover legal fees and expenses may now be paid to current and past participants in our 401(k) plans. Mutual of Omaha is proud of its ongoing commitment to provide a valuable suite of benefits to its employees, including its 401(k) plans.”
Among other defense strategies, the firms stated that at least some of the alleged breaches of fiduciary duty would have occurred more than six years before the lawsuit was filed, falling outside of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act’s statute of repose.
The two plans in the lawsuit, the Mutual of Omaha 401(k) and the Mutual of Omaha 401(k) Long-term Savings Plan, represented more than $900 million in assets among about 8,600 participants as of the end of 2018, data from the Department of Labor show.
The total $6.7 million settlement payment, if approved by the court, would include up to $2.2 million in attorneys’ fees and as much as $10,000 for each of the three named participants in the suit, in addition to payments for the affected class members.
The case was filed in U.S. District Court in the District of Nebraska. Law firms Schneider Wallace Cottrell Konecky and Berger Montague, both of which have extensively been involved in 401(k) litigation in recent years, represent the plaintiffs. Law firm Morgan Lewis & Bockius represents Mutual of Omaha in the litigation.
A $141M judgment and a federal asset freeze collide over one shrinking pool
The firm's CFO and EVP of Wealth Management Solutions are the latest executives to exit the broker-dealer.
Clients are saying they would consider switching advisors if another professional offered estate planning services, according to a new Trust & Will survey.
CEO Laurel Taylor says the fintech's composable AI stack helps workers optimize dollars across Trump Accounts, 529s, 401(k)s, and other employee benefits.
The bank has swiped three private banking veterans from BNY as the city climbs the ranks of America's fastest-growing wealth hubs.
Dan Biagini of American Equity says the steady decline of pensions, longer lifespans and a reset in interest rates are rewriting how advisors build retirement income
Direct indexing is on pace to outgrow ETFs and mutual funds. Northern Trust's Ken Lassner explains why the advisors who get it wish they had started sooner.
