The trick of Social Security in first year of retirement

Earnings in months leading up to retirement date can be ignored.
DEC 13, 2013
Often people who retire in mid-year have already earned more than Social Security's annual earnings limit that applies to those who collect benefits before their full retirement age. Normally, people who collect Social Security benefits before their full retirement age, currently 66, must forfeit $1 in benefits for every $2 earned over a prescribed limit. For this year, the earnings cap is $15,120. That is why there is a special one-year rule that applies to earnings during the first year of retirement. Under this rule, an individual can get a full Social Security check for any whole month he or she is retired, regardless of yearly earnings prior to claiming benefits. I received an e-mail from Kathie Beaupre-Vietor in Michigan this morning with a question about this very subject. She is 64 and needs to resign from her job with American Eagle Airlines for medical reasons. Ms. Beaupre-Vietor's financial adviser urged her to contact me with her question. "I have talked to a Social Security representative recently and he told me that because I have already earned over $15,120 this year, the government will withhold benefits based on my earnings since Jan. 1 if I apply for benefits this month," she wrote in an e-mail to me. "It does not make sense to me that the government would use my earnings from Jan. 1 since I have not been receiving Social Security benefits for that period," Ms. Beaupre-Vietor wrote. "If we are penalized for working more than half of the year, why would anyone retire at any time except the first quarter?" Great question. And it seems that Ms. Beaupre-Vietor got an incorrect answer from the Social Security representative. In 2013, a person who is under full retirement age for the entire year is considered retired if his or her monthly earnings are $1,260 or less, according to Social Security's publication "How Work Affects Your Benefits." The monthly limit is 1/12 of the 2013 annual earnings limit of $15,120. So as long as Ms. Beaupre-Vietor's monthly earnings are below that level for the rest of the year, she should receive her full retirement checks, even though her earnings through July exceeded the annual earnings limit. However, if she earns more than $1,260 for any month during the remainder of the year after she begins receiving retirement benefits, she wouldn't receive a Social Security check for that month. As Ms. Beaupre-Vietor doesn't intend to continue working, this won't be a problem. The earnings restriction applies only to income from a job, not from a pension, investments or other source of income. Beginning in 2014, the yearly (rather than monthly) earnings restrictions limits would apply. The annual earnings limit, currently $15,120, usually is increased each year to reflect inflation. Because she is claiming benefits two years early, Ms. Beaupre-Vietor will receive about 86% of her retirement benefit, compared with the 100% she would have collected if she had waited until her full retirement age of 66 to collect. However, because she is retiring for medical reasons, I suggested that she apply for Social Security disability benefits at the same time. Her claim to collect retirement benefits will be automatic. Not so for disability applications which are reviewed on a case-by-case basis and adhere to strict medical guidelines. But if eventually approved for disability benefits, Ms. Beaupre-Vietor would be entitled to her full retirement benefit, even if she was younger than 66.

Latest News

MAI Capital expands in California with $551 million OG Private Wealth deal
MAI Capital expands in California with $551 million OG Private Wealth deal

The Cleveland-based RIA's latest tie-up extends the firm's national footprint into the Golden State, where opinions continue to be split over a contentious billionaire wealth tax proposal.

Advisor moves: Missouri-based LPL team decamps to Osaic in full-circle succession
Advisor moves: Missouri-based LPL team decamps to Osaic in full-circle succession

Meanwhile, Cetera has welcomed a family-run practice from Commonwealth, and a Merrill advisor joins an existing UBS team in Connecticut.

Wealth Enhancement extends acquisition streak with Washington state deal
Wealth Enhancement extends acquisition streak with Washington state deal

The Olympia, Washington firm's retirement planning expertise reinforces the consolidator's growth momentum to exceed $160 billion in client assets.

Building AI you can trust in wealth management
Building AI you can trust in wealth management

Beyond content generation and execution, firms that can offer answers around governance, transparency, and supervision are set to pull ahead in the next leg of the AI race.

Advisor moves: Veteran teams with $580M in assets leave Wells Fargo
Advisor moves: Veteran teams with $580M in assets leave Wells Fargo

The experienced advisory teams join Ameriprise and Janney as the race for experienced talent continues.

SPONSORED Direct indexing webinar targets tax-loss harvesting amid market swings

Northern Trust’s Ken Lassner shows advisors how to convert volatility into after-tax portfolio gains

SPONSORED Who builds the income when the pension disappears?

Dan Biagini of American Equity says the steady decline of pensions, longer lifespans and a reset in interest rates are rewriting how advisors build retirement income