Will newly proposed tax changes whack the wealthy?

With the Bush tax cuts extended for another two years, the status remains quo on major — and imminent — potential changes in tax law, right?
JUN 08, 2011
With the Bush tax cuts extended for another two years, the status remains quo on major — and imminent — potential changes in tax law, right? Wrong. The budget released by the Obama administration this week has a number of tax proposals that could hit wealthy Americans and investors hard at the beginning of next year, according to Robert Gordon, president of Twenty-First Securities Corp. The most significant of these changes is another proposal by the administration to limit the benefits that wealthy taxpayers can get from itemizing tax deductions. The biggest such deductions include mortgage interest payments and charitable contributions. Under the proposal, single taxpayers making more than $171,850 and married people making more than $209,250 would be allowed to reduce their tax liability from deductions only at a rate of 28%. That’s the same rate at which a single taxpayer making between $82,400 and $171,850 can claim. The Congressional Budget Office has estimated that such a change would bring in about $300 billion over the next 10 years. The president has argued for the proposal in his previous two budgets. After all, Mr. Obama himself has asked why rich people — including the president — get to write off more of a charitable contribution or an interest payment than a middle-class family. “I don’t think that’s fair,” Mr. Obama said in early 2009 when he introduced his first budget proposal. Mr. Gordon, however, points out that the government effectively would be saddling higher-income taxpayers with a new tax. “The administration is saying that a dollar coming in the door is taxable at one rate and a dollar going out is deductible at a lower rate. It’s technically not a tax increase, but it amounts to that.” For example, a dollar of legitimately deductible expense no longer would offset a dollar of income earned for wealthier taxpayers. Instead, those in the 35% tax bracket would lose 7 cents on the dollar after tax — a $1 deduction would cost them 72 cents rather than 65 cents. The proposal could make things a lot tougher for investors using margin accounts, as well. If an investor earned $100,000 in interest and/or short-term capital gains and spent $100,000 in deductible interest to earn it, he or she would be on the hook for $7,000 in taxes. “They would have to earn more on their portfolios to break even,” Mr. Gordon said. In the last two budgets, charitable groups were particularly critical of the proposal, fearing that wealthy taxpayers would cut back on their giving. This time around, however, the $300 billion in extra revenue may look a lot more attractive to Congress given the increasingly dire deficit situation. “I’m not sure people realize this would kick in next January,” Mr. Gordon said.

Latest News

Newsom wants nationwide billionaires tax as presidential bid may loom on the horizon
Newsom wants nationwide billionaires tax as presidential bid may loom on the horizon

“It’s time for an economic reset,” wrote the California governor, in a post on X.

Maryland regulators spank fledgling art-focused RIA Masterworks over registration snafus
Maryland regulators spank fledgling art-focused RIA Masterworks over registration snafus

Masterworks was launched in 2017 but its RIA, Masterworks Advisers, is just three years old.

Investors allege Miami operator took over $1.5 million in EB-5 scheme
Investors allege Miami operator took over $1.5 million in EB-5 scheme

One 2017 form, no broker license, and a $42 million gap they say surfaced on a webinar.

Gen X, millennials lag in retirement confidence amid knowledge gap
Gen X, millennials lag in retirement confidence amid knowledge gap

Fewer than half of Americans in their peak earning years feel on track for retirement, while many say limited financial knowledge and access to professional guidance are holding them back.

Advisor moves: Veteran-led UBS team overseeing $460 million migrates to Merrill
Advisor moves: Veteran-led UBS team overseeing $460 million migrates to Merrill

Meanwhile, Wells Fargo hauled advisors overseeing $825 million in the West Coast, while Wedbush has welcomed a seasoned professional from Stifel in California.

SPONSORED Who builds the income when the pension disappears?

Dan Biagini of American Equity says the steady decline of pensions, longer lifespans and a reset in interest rates are rewriting how advisors build retirement income

SPONSORED Why direct indexing stopped being optional

Direct indexing is on pace to outgrow ETFs and mutual funds. Northern Trust's Ken Lassner explains why the advisors who get it wish they had started sooner.