Just 2 states require their investment advisers to file Form CRS

Just 2 states require their investment advisers to file Form CRS
Rhode Island, Oklahoma advisers join SEC-registered advisers in meeting June 30 deadline
JUN 12, 2020

Investment advisers registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission are scrambling to put together a client relationship summary required by the agency’s investment advice reform rules that go into force at the end of the month.

Advisers registered at the state level don’t have the same deadline bearing down – unless they operate in Oklahoma or Rhode Island.

The so-called Form CRS is part of the regulatory package that also includes Regulation Best Interest, the new advice standard for brokers. The new rules must be implemented by June 30.

In Form CRS, advisers and brokers outline their services, fees, costs, conflicts of interest, the standard of conduct that governs them and disciplinary history. The document, which is two pages for stand-alone advisers and brokers and four pages for dual registrants, also outlines key questions investors should ask before selecting a financial professional.

The Form CRS requirement applies to SEC-registered advisers, who have more than $100 million in assets under management. Advisers with less than $100 million AUM register with their states.

Most state regulators have resisted Form CRS from the beginning of the rulemaking process. In an August 23, 2018, comment letter, the North American Securities Administrators Association outlined their concerns about the disclosure document.

State regulators have criticized the SEC for promulgating Form CRS without conducting appropriate investor testing. They also say it is duplicative of information recorded in the adviser registration document known as Form ADV.

Most states are not imposing a Form CRS requirement on their advisers because of continued worries that it won’t be effective.

“We’re really concerned it’s going to be another boilerplate form that is not going to be useful to investors,” said Andrea Seidt, Ohio securities commissioner. “If that’s the case, we would not require it in our state. It may exacerbate investor confusion. We want to make sure it delivers the value that it promises.”

One of the outliers is Oklahoma. State-registered advisers must attach Form CRS to their Form ADV Part 2 in the Investment Adviser Registration Depository.

“We’re requiring that they file it through IARD so that there is a complete Form ADV on file,” said Melanie Hall, Oklahoma securities administrator.

The state is not mandating delivery of Form CRS to retail clients but is encouraging it as a “best practice,” Hall said. The document will help clients grasp how an adviser operates.

“The Form CRS becomes an important part of that understanding,” Hall said.

A Rhode Island securities official was not available for comment.

Valerie Mirko, a partner at Baker & McKenzie, doesn’t anticipate states will follow in the footsteps of Oklahoma and Rhode Island. The IARD doesn’t give states the ability to file Form CRS as a Form ADV Part 3 the way it does for SEC-registered advisers.

“I don’t expect additional states to move forward on adopting Form CRS,” Mirko said.

State regulators don’t have plans to draft a model rule for a disclosure document to supplement Form ADV, said Christopher Gerold, chief of the New Jersey Bureau of Securities and NASAA president.

Instead, they will monitor how Form CRS works.

“We’re going to look at the data,” Gerold said. “A lot of it is going to be a product of getting a better understanding of the impact of Form CRS.”

In a few weeks, an investor assessing financial professionals would get a Form CRS from an SEC-registered adviser but not from a state-registered adviser.

“I don’t see that it would cause a problem,” Gerold said. “We’re always focused on investor protection. ADV Parts 1 and 2, if done appropriately, are going to give [investors] the information they need to make that decision.”

Mirko agreed Form ADV disclosures can be as effective as Form CRS, depending on the conversation with the investor.

“It really depends on how the state-registered advisers provide [their ADV] information and how they walk the investor through it,” Mirko said.

Latest News

Texas man says SEC and fund could make him pay twice
Texas man says SEC and fund could make him pay twice

A $141M judgment and a federal asset freeze collide over one shrinking pool

Osaic executives Kristy Britt and Greg Cornick to leave
Osaic executives Kristy Britt and Greg Cornick to leave

The firm's CFO and EVP of Wealth Management Solutions are the latest executives to exit the broker-dealer.

Estate planning becomes a client retention issue for financial advisors, survey finds
Estate planning becomes a client retention issue for financial advisors, survey finds

Clients are saying they would consider switching advisors if another professional offered estate planning services, according to a new Trust & Will survey.

Candidly adds AI agents for Trump Accounts, workplace benefits
Candidly adds AI agents for Trump Accounts, workplace benefits

CEO Laurel Taylor says the fintech's composable AI stack helps workers optimize dollars across Trump Accounts, 529s, 401(k)s, and other employee benefits.

BMO adds three advisors in Dallas amid Y'all Street wealth boom
BMO adds three advisors in Dallas amid Y'all Street wealth boom

The bank has swiped three banking veterans from BNY as the city climbs the ranks of America's fastest-growing wealth hubs.

SPONSORED Who builds the income when the pension disappears?

Dan Biagini of American Equity says the steady decline of pensions, longer lifespans and a reset in interest rates are rewriting how advisors build retirement income

SPONSORED Why direct indexing stopped being optional

Direct indexing is on pace to outgrow ETFs and mutual funds. Northern Trust's Ken Lassner explains why the advisors who get it wish they had started sooner.