Mass. firms sue Citigroup for alleged ARS fraud

Several Braintree, Mass.-based firms filed suit yesterday in federal district court charging a Citigroup subsidiary with fraudulently selling auction rate securities while the firm was under investigation.
APR 17, 2009
Several Braintree, Mass.-based firms filed suit yesterday in federal district court charging a Citigroup subsidiary with fraudulently selling auction rate securities while the firm was under investigation. In the suit — filed against Citigroup Global Markets Inc., a subsidiary of Citigroup Inc. of New York, and its brokerage and advisory unit, Smith Barney — Braintree Laboratories Inc., Braintree Holdings and Braintree Real Estate Management Co. LLC, claim that Citigroup sold them more than $33 million in auction rate securities at the same time the firm was being investigated by government agencies. The plaintiffs alleged: “While facing criminal and administrative investigations into its fraudulent sales of auction rate securities, Citigroup concealed from regulators and customers its continued sales of such toxic instruments by means of false and misleading descriptions, and also destroyed relevant evidence concerning its wrongdoing.” The suit claims that between June 2008 and August 2008, Citigroup sold the Braintree firms approximately $33.3 million in auction rate securities. “As late as August 6, 2008, the day before Citigroup publicly announced its partial settlement with the Securities and Exchange Commission and several state regulators, Citigroup sold auction rate securities to the Braintree entities,” the document stated. Further, it claims that Citigroup described the investments as “seven-day rolls” and stated that they were “government-backed money market investments that could be sold at par at any time on seven days’ notice.” In reality, the investments were illiquid auction rate securities, the suit said. The sales also took place close in proximity to “Citigroup erasing recordings of conversations involving employees at its auction rate desk,” according to documents. The plaintiffs are seeking the full price at which the investments were sold, other punitive damages with interest, and attorneys’ fees and costs. A spokeswoman for Citigroup declined to comment on the lawsuit.

Latest News

Fed's Bowman pushes for lighter-touch AI oversight at smaller firms
Fed's Bowman pushes for lighter-touch AI oversight at smaller firms

Supervision vice chair speaks following recent launch of AI adoption practices by regulators.

Why fixed income still belongs in your clients' portfolios
Why fixed income still belongs in your clients' portfolios

In an era of AI euphoria and market FOMO, getting back to basics with fixed income may be the most contrarian and most important move advisors can make.

Voya expands advisor managed accounts to add private market assets
Voya expands advisor managed accounts to add private market assets

Voya Financial adds private equity, credit and real estate options to its AMA program, building on support for looser federal investment rules in retirement accounts.

With executives leaving, Osaic’s Reid now in the spotlight
With executives leaving, Osaic’s Reid now in the spotlight

Shannon Reid, president of Osaic and the network’s number two executive, has plenty of challenges, industry executives said.

Investors sue crypto fund and platform, alleging $1.5 million never returned
Investors sue crypto fund and platform, alleging $1.5 million never returned

Auditors flagged the commingling. The COO allegedly knew. Investors kept getting the pitch

SPONSORED Who builds the income when the pension disappears?

Dan Biagini of American Equity says the steady decline of pensions, longer lifespans and a reset in interest rates are rewriting how advisors build retirement income

SPONSORED Why direct indexing stopped being optional

Direct indexing is on pace to outgrow ETFs and mutual funds. Northern Trust's Ken Lassner explains why the advisors who get it wish they had started sooner.