Advisers may not feel it yet, but downward fee pressure is coming

Advisers may not feel it yet, but downward fee pressure is coming
Fidelity study finds RIA firm revenue yield fell to 69 basis points last year from between 72 and 73 basis points over the prior four years.
DEC 12, 2016
Financial advisers might not feel the increased pressure on fees this year, or next, but it is coming, according to the 2016 Fidelity RIA Benchmarking study. Factoring in the increased pressure from realities such as the rapid growth of low-cost robo-platforms, as well as shrinking organic asset growth rates, the bottom line is that registered investment advisers will need to adjust pricing models and services in order to survive. According to the survey findings, only 9% of RIAs said changing their pricing structure was a strategic focus for their firm. This despite increasing data showing fee pressure is on the horizon. For example, the study found that median RIA firm revenue yield fell to 69 basis points last year from between 72 and 73 basis points over the prior four years. And organic growth, meaning new assets into a firm, dropped to 6.7%, which is the lowest level in five years. The findings are in sync with the InvestmentNews 2016 Financial Performance Study, which showed 8% revenue growth last year, down from 15% in 2014 and 18% in 2013. “Many firms do not appear to be changing their approach to pricing, potentially hindering their ability to grow in the years to come,” said David Canter, executive vice president for practice management and consulting at Fidelity Clearing & Custody Solutions. As Mr. Canter explained it, advisers are breathing a “sigh of relief” that the pricing pressure isn't yet at their doorstep, but there might be a lot of denial out there among RIAs. “The outlook is that it's still a great business to be in, revenues can be defended and margins are strong,” he said. “There is a sigh of relief that fee pressure isn't coming tomorrow or next year, but we've been very vocal that we are expecting price changes and margin compression on the horizon. The future-ready business will need to scale systems and technology to survive.” The survey, which was conducted in early summer and included 402 RIA firms, found that 44% of RIAs are not concerned with the challenges of changing their pricing models because they feel they are effective as is.
RIAs cling to traditional pricing models
Source: The 2016 Fidelity RIA Benchmarking Study
The survey also found that most firms don't recognize the threat to fees from some of the macro industry trends. Only 30% of respondents saw the increasing commoditization of investment management as a major driver of pricing model change. And only 20% saw the impact of robo-platforms as potentially driving pricing model changes. Then there is the issue of fee clarity and understanding. Nearly three-quarters of RIAs agreed with the statement: “Our firm's pricing is simple and easily understood by our clients.” A big problem with that self-assessment, according to Mr. Canter, is the reality of what clients are paying for and what they're receiving. At firms that follow the common practice of bundling services for a single asset-based fee, clients often are not receiving or utilizing services that are part of the bundle.
Firms that think the following will be key drivers of fee changes:
Source: The 2016 Fidelity RIA Benchmarking Study
RIAs downplay macro pricing pressures
Despite their prevalence, most firms do not feel that industry macro trends will drive pricing model change. In addition, firms are not currently feeling pressure from clients or prospects to clarify or justify their fees.
Source: The 2016 Fidelity RIA Benchmarking Study
For example, 97% of firms include investment management services as part of a bundled fee, and that service is used by 100% of clients. But 88% of firms bundle philanthropic planning, which is used by just 15% of clients. Concierge services is part of the bundled fee at 82% of RIAs, but used by only 10% of clients. And trust services is bundled at 74% of RIAs, and used by just 9% of clients. “It's the classic issue of when services are bundled and not always taken advantage of by clients it can create a value gap,” Mr. Canter said. “In the future it will have to be more transparent. But at the same time you may have to include these services to preserve your fee.”

Latest News

Prime Capital Financial, Carnegie expand Eastern footprints
Prime Capital Financial, Carnegie expand Eastern footprints

The two national RIA firms are bolstering their presence separately in Georgia and Connecticut with new billion-dollar acquisitions.

Embattled TD Bank eyes $14B raise in Schwab stake exit
Embattled TD Bank eyes $14B raise in Schwab stake exit

The banking giant is looking to sell its interest in the online brokerage giant amid the continuing fallout of its historic money-laundering settlement with federal regulators.

Next-gen woman advisor managing $200M switches from UBS to Sanctuary Wealth
Next-gen woman advisor managing $200M switches from UBS to Sanctuary Wealth

Advisor joins the Partnered Independence model for new firm launch.

How did US institutional investors navigate the choppy waters of Q4, 2024?
How did US institutional investors navigate the choppy waters of Q4, 2024?

Median return for institutions managing a combined $1.4T revealed.

Trump set to hit foreign steel imports with 25% tariffs
Trump set to hit foreign steel imports with 25% tariffs

Canada, Mexico appear to be included despite pause on other levies.

SPONSORED Taylor Matthews on what's behind Farther's rapid growth

From 'no clients' to reshaping wealth management, Farther blends tech and trust to deliver family-office experience at scale.

SPONSORED Why wealth advisors should care about the future of federal tax policy

Blue Vault features expert strategies to harness for maximum client advantage.