Subscribe

SEC orders firm to pay more than $1 million over 12b-1 fees

SEC building view from below

Agency charges Burbank, California-based NPB Financial Group with disclosure, best execution failures

The Securities and Exchange Commission ordered NPB Financial Group to pay more than $1 million to settle charges that it failed to disclose payments it received from mutual funds that it recommended to clients.

The Aug. 20 order says that from January 2014 through March 2019, NPB advised clients to purchase or hold mutual funds that charged 12b-1 fees when less expensive share classes of the same funds were available.

Burbank, California-based NPB is dually registered as an investment adviser and a broker. The high-fee funds were recommended to advisory clients, and the 12b-1 fees were paid to the brokerage side of the firm.

The SEC said the firm did not explain to clients the conflict of interest related to its 12b-1 fee revenue. The SEC also claimed NPB violated best execution rules because the funds that charged 12b-1 fees provided less value to clients at the time they were purchased than share classes that did not charge the fees.

The firm did not admit nor deny the SEC’s findings. A firm spokesperson was not immediately available for comment.

Under the settlement, NPB agreed to pay disgorgement of $532,519.96 and prejudgment interest of $92,668.15. The firm also will pay a $425,000 fine.

The SEC imposed the fine because NPB did not self-report as part of the agency’s share-class selection disclosure initiative. Firms that turned themselves in for inadequate 12b-1 fee disclosures in that program paid disgorgement but avoided civil monetary penalties.

The action against NPB was the second the SEC has taken recently against a firm that did not participate in the share-class initiative. In an Aug. 13 order, SCF Investment Advisors agreed to pay $767,192 over inadequate disclosure of 12b-1 and revenue-sharing payments as well as best execution failures.

The SEC’s cases have centered on the lack of disclosure surrounding 12b-1 fees rather than the actual receipt of them.

“To meet this fiduciary obligation, NPB was required to provide its advisory clients with full and fair disclosure that is sufficiently specific so that they could understand the conflicts of interest concerning NPB’s advice about investing in different classes of mutual funds and could have an informed basis on which they could consent to or reject the conflicts,” the SEC order states.

The share-class initiative concluded earlier this year after returning about $139 million to harmed investors. The SEC’s crackdown on 12b-1 fees has generated criticism from the brokerage industry. Critics say the agency is engaging in rulemaking by enforcement  because it is penalizing firms for practices that had been routine and acceptable without giving them warning about the policy change.  

Related Topics: ,

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

Wealth firms must prepare for demise of non-competes, despite legal challenges to FTC rule

A growing sentiment against restricting employee moves could affect non-solicitation, too.

FPA, CFP Board diverge on DOL investment advice proposal

While the CFP Board supports the proposal, the FPA has expressed concerns about the DOL rule potentially raising compliance costs for members, increasing the cost of advice and reducing access to advice for some.

Braxton encourages RIAs to see investing in diversity as a business strategy

‘If a firm values its human capital, then it will make an investment to make sure that their talent can flourish for the advancement of the bottom line,’ says Lazetta Rainey Braxton, co-CEO of 2050 Wealth Partners.

Bill chips away at SALT block but comes with drawbacks, advisors say

'I’d love to see the [full] SALT deduction come back but not if it means rates go up,' one advisor says.

Former Morgan Stanley broker running for office reviewing $147K award

Deborah Adeimy claimed firm blocked her from running in GOP primary, aide says 'we're unclear how award figure was calculated.'

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print