Subscribe

Woodbridge executives settle with SEC for $3.75 million

former

The two executives, Dane Roseman and Ivan Acevedo, were both sales managers for Woodbridge at different times between 2013 and 2017.

After pleading guilty to criminal charges over the summer, two senior executives of the Woodbridge Group of Companies on Friday settled civil charges with the Securities and Exchange Commission for $3.75 million.

The two executives, Dane Roseman and Ivan Acevedo, were both sales managers for Woodbridge at different times between 2013 and 2017. They worked for Robert Shapiro, Woodbridge’s CEO, who in 2019 received the maximum sentence of 25 years in prison for running a $1.3 billion fraud that caused more than 7,000 retirees and other investors to lose money.

Shapiro, of Sherman Oaks, California, promised returns as high as 10% from investments in loans to property developers. Instead, he used money from new investors to repay earlier ones and used $36 million to buy luxury homes, wines, paintings and custom-designed jewelry for his wife.

Roseman agreed to pay disgorgement of $2.43 million plus $423,000 in interest, according to the SEC, while Acevedo agreed to pay $743,000 in disgorgement plus $161,000 in interest. In September, a federal judge in Miami sentenced both Roseman and Acevedo to five years in prison.

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc. over the past few years has suspended and barred a number of brokers who sold the Woodbridge securities, which were unregistered securities.

As sales managers, Roseman and Acevedo sold Woodbridge securities and trained and supervised Woodbridge internal sales agents who sold Woodbridge securities, according to the U.S. Attorney’s office. Using high-pressure sales tactics, Shapiro, Roseman, Acevedo, and others marketed and promoted these investments as low-risk, safe, simple and conservative.

Shapiro, Roseman and Acevedo falsely claimed that Woodbridge was profitable and advertised high rates of return to investors, according to the U.S. Attorney. However, Shapiro’s real estate portfolio failed to generate sufficient cash flow to satisfy the loan obligations and interest payments owed to investors.

To make up for the cash deficiency, Shapiro resorted to making Ponzi payments, meaning hundreds of millions of dollars invested by new investors were used to pay “returns” to older, existing Woodbridge investors, according to the U.S. Attorney.

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

Solid start to wealth management deals in 2024: report

"We’re seeing continued deal flow of mid-sized and smaller RIAs, along with broker-dealers, too," one banker said.

LPL’s Chris Cassidy talks Atria deal, credit unions

'Credit unions are nonprofit institutions, so that creates a collaborative approach,' Cassidy says.

Bankrupt GWG bonds not right for anyone: Finra arbitrator

By 2020, 'GWG had shown years of losses and large negative cash flows,' a securities arbitrator writes.

SEC dings Minnesota investment manager over pay-to-play conflict

'Is four grand really going to influence a politician’s thinking?' one consultant asks.

Advisor attrition dropping at Merrill Lynch

Although departures of financial advisors may have slowed at certain large firms, that doesn't mean the problem's been squelched.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print