President Donald Trump’s bid to block large investors from buying single-family homes is running into resistance on Capitol Hill, putting one of his headline housing ideas on hold even as affordability pressures mount for many Americans.
The White House has been pressing congressional Republicans to graft an investor ban onto major housing packages moving through the House and Senate, according to people familiar with the talks who spoke with the Wall Street Journal. Lawmakers in both chambers, however, have reportedly balked at attaching the measure, warning it could fracture the fragile bipartisan support behind bills aimed at boosting housing supply.
In the House, Financial Services Committee chair French Hill of Arkansas rejected a request to add the ban to the Housing for the 21st Century Act, an omnibus proposal focused on streamlining approvals and encouraging new construction. Instead, the committee scheduled a separate hearing to review three standalone investor-ban bills authored by House members, underscoring how divisive the idea has become within the Republican caucus.
Hill’s panel had already spent months forging what he described as “tremendous consensus” around a supply-side package before Trump's executive order last month targeting large buyers of single-family homes. Lawmakers say the administration still has not clearly defined what counts as a “large institutional investor” or even which properties would be covered, raising concerns about unintended consequences for smaller landlords and regional players.
Philosophical objections are just as strong. Many Republicans on the Financial Services Committee view an outright ban as a sharp break from free-market principles and property rights. A similar dynamic is emerging in the Senate, where any Trump-backed amendment to the ROAD to Housing Act would need GOP support to move forward.
The standoff highlights a broader split between Congress and the White House over how to tackle a housing crunch that drove sales last year to a 30-year low and pushed home values more than 50% above 2019 levels. Lawmakers in both parties have gravitated toward supply measures, such as zoning incentives and support for new construction near transit. Trump, by contrast, has repeatedly signaled he does not want policy changes that risk pulling prices down.
“I don’t want to drive housing prices down. I want to drive housing prices up for people that own their homes, and they can be assured that’s what’s going to happen,” Trump told his Cabinet on Jan. 29, according to the Associated Press.
At the same time, the president has been under pressure to speak to younger voters squeezed by higher borrowing costs and limited inventory. His January executive order declared that “large institutional investors should not buy single-family homes that could otherwise be purchased by families,” directing agencies to draft guidance restricting such purchases and ordering the Treasury Department, Justice Department and Federal Trade Commission to scrutinize big home-buying programs and potential anti-competitive behavior.
Polling cited by the White House indicates broad voter support for tighter rules on corporate landlords, especially among younger adults who have struggled to buy. Republicans worry that siding too visibly with Wall Street landlords could alienate under-40 voters who were critical to Trump’s 2024 re-election, while a crackdown risks unnerving donors and clients in real estate and private equity.
Some Republicans have lined up behind the president’s approach. Ohio senator Bernie Moreno said he would lead efforts to draft legislation codifying the ban. Indiana representative Marlin Stutzman, who has introduced his own bill after praising the proposal in a letter to Trump, acknowledged the internal friction but argued the White House is unlikely to let the issue drop.
“There’s been some pushback,” said Stutzman. “But the president thinks it’s important.”
Regardless federal-level resolve, making American housing affordable again may be easier said than done. According to Edward Pinto, a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, a boom in the US economy this year could lead to higher housing demand. For average home price gains to stay flat over the next three years, there'd have to be a 50% to 100% increase in single-family home building over the next three years.
"It’s very hard to crater home prices," Pinto told the AP.
IRAs now hold nearly twice the assets of 401(k) plans — and most of that money didn't arrive through annual contributions.
A new survey finds that many women prioritize financial security but continue to leave savings in accounts that may not keep pace with inflation.
Roundhill, Bitwise and GraniteShares funds remain on hold while the agency weighs how novel ETFs should be regulated.
"Shares of alternative assets managers have lagged this year as investors grow wary of private-credit exposure."
The fintech platform is touting a new AI-free Planning Observations feature, which draws on IRS tax records to uncover opportunities for advisors.
Dan Biagini of American Equity says the steady decline of pensions, longer lifespans and a reset in interest rates are rewriting how advisors build retirement income
Direct indexing is on pace to outgrow ETFs and mutual funds. Northern Trust's Ken Lassner explains why the advisors who get it wish they had started sooner.
