Trump’s global tariffs struck down by US Supreme Court

Trump’s global tariffs struck down by US Supreme Court
Advisors say ruling could pave the way for accelerated Fed rate cuts this year.
FEB 20, 2026

The U.S. Supreme Court has struck down President Donald Trump’s sweeping “Liberation Day” global tariffs, abruptly dismantling a core pillar of his second-term economic strategy.

The decision centered on whether the administration could use the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose across-the-board tariffs of at least 10%—and up to 50% for some countries—on imports from nearly all major trading partners. Lower courts had previously ruled that IEEPA did not authorize such broad, revenue-oriented duties and that the approach raised serious concerns.

The law that underpins those import duties “does not authorize the President to impose tariffs,” the majority ruled, according to CNBC.

Chief Justice John Roberts said Trump "asserts the extraordinary power to unilaterally impose tariffs of unlimited amount, duration and scope," but that "in light of the breadth, history, and constitutional context of that asserted authority, he must identify clear congressional authorization to exercise it." 

This ruling forces an abrupt reset of U.S. trade policy and removes—at least temporarily—hundreds of billions of dollars in expected tariff revenue that had been partially earmarked to offset tax cuts and fund Trump’s proposed “tariff dividend” for households. 

Importantly, while the ruling specifically targets the use of IEEPA—a law traditionally used for freezing assets or imposing sanctions—as a tool for broad trade taxes, officials have already signaled they may attempt to maintain the tariff framework using other statutes, such as Section 232, which already covers tariffs on steel, aluminum and automotive sectors.

Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Brett Kavanaugh dissented today's ruling and Kavanaugh wrote in his dissent that the refund process “is likely to be a ‘mess,’” after predicting that the short-term impact of the ruling “could be substantial.”

Markets muted

The markets initially reacted positively as stocks gained but overall was muted. Shares of retailers and other companies that were hit hard last year by rising costs lifted. CNBC reported that, as of 11:04am ET, the Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 93.81 points, or 0.2%, recovering from a 200-point loss earlier in the session on disappointing economic data. The S&P 500 traded up 0.3%, while the Nasdaq Composite rose 0.5%.

Shares of “Magnificent Seven” member Amazon jumped 2% following the ruling. Industrial giant Caterpillar reversed earlier losses, rising almost 1%.

Overall, though, markets were largely uninterested because the ruling was largely expected and, crucially, it's not clear that tariffs are going away any time soon.

Jamie Cox, Managing Partner for Harris Financial Group in Richmond, V.A., told InvestmentNews today's events could be more significant for the Federal Reserve. "The Supreme Court decision will pave the way for accelerated rate cuts as inflation expectations from tariffs are now less of a factor. The looming question is what new authority the administration will use to salvage some of the tariff revenue."

And Jeff Buchbinder, Chief Equity Strategist for LPL Financial agreed that expectations of a Fed cut will now rise. "We would fade a short-term bounce on the Supreme Court ruling because the Trump administration will quickly pivot to different legal grounds for replacement tariffs while deficits go higher in the interim. However, if lower tariffs help cool inflation, it could firm up expectations for Fed rate cuts later this year."

Trump 'seething inside'

According to the Wall Street Journal, President Trump had just started a closed-door White House meeting with governors when he found out. He reportedly told those sitting near him that while he looked calm, he was seething inside. He called the ruling a disgrace, the report said.

The President then cut cut short a question-and-answer session with governors and left the room to work on his response to the ruling. 

 

Latest News

Newsom wants nationwide billionaires tax as presidential bid may loom on the horizon
Newsom wants nationwide billionaires tax as presidential bid may loom on the horizon

“It’s time for an economic reset,” wrote the California governor, in a post on X.

Maryland regulators spank fledgling art-focused RIA Masterworks over registration snafus
Maryland regulators spank fledgling art-focused RIA Masterworks over registration snafus

Masterworks was launched in 2017 but its RIA, Masterworks Advisers, is just three years old.

Investors allege Miami operator took over $1.5 million in EB-5 scheme
Investors allege Miami operator took over $1.5 million in EB-5 scheme

One 2017 form, no broker license, and a $42 million gap they say surfaced on a webinar.

Gen X, millennials lag in retirement confidence amid knowledge gap
Gen X, millennials lag in retirement confidence amid knowledge gap

Fewer than half of Americans in their peak earning years feel on track for retirement, while many say limited financial knowledge and access to professional guidance are holding them back.

Advisor moves: Veteran-led UBS team overseeing $460 million migrates to Merrill
Advisor moves: Veteran-led UBS team overseeing $460 million migrates to Merrill

Meanwhile, Wells Fargo hauled advisors overseeing $825 million in the West Coast, while Wedbush has welcomed a seasoned professional from Stifel in California.

SPONSORED Who builds the income when the pension disappears?

Dan Biagini of American Equity says the steady decline of pensions, longer lifespans and a reset in interest rates are rewriting how advisors build retirement income

SPONSORED Why direct indexing stopped being optional

Direct indexing is on pace to outgrow ETFs and mutual funds. Northern Trust's Ken Lassner explains why the advisors who get it wish they had started sooner.