Subscribe

Ex-Ameriprise manager: I got fired for flagging violations

Loscalso claims he was axed for warning firm about lax oversight of brokers; 'fraud, forgery'

A former branch manager for Ameriprise Financial Inc. has sued the company, alleging he was fired in November for raising serious allegations about the firm’s oversight of brokers.
Michael Loscalso, who began his career at the forerunner of Ameriprise in 1989, alleged in the lawsuit that his repeated complaints to management “about fraud, forgery and other practices which violated SEC rules and regulations led to the retaliatory termination of his employment” by Ameriprise. The suit was filed Oct. 8 in U.S. District Court in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
Mr. Loscalso is seeking backpay and unspecified damages from Ameriprise. He earned $260,000 per year and supervised more than 50 registered reps, and 60 licensed and unlicensed staff, at an Ameriprise branch in West Conshohocken, Pa.
The “whistleblower” lawsuit further alleges that Mr. Loscalso was engaged in the “protected activity of reporting violations of Securities and Exchange Commission rules and regulations to management on numerous occasions throughout his employment and immediately prior to his termination.” (View the suit here.)
According to the lawsuit, which was reported earlier today by Courthouse News Service, the violations reported by Mr. Loscalso included incidents relating to forgery, fraud, unlicensed sales, unlicensed signing of documents, overcharging for financial planning services, under-delivery of financial planning advice, and breaches of client privacy and data security.
In one case that Mr. Loscalso said he reported, a broker’s assistant signed 30 annuity applications on the broker’s behalf. Ameriprise issued the rep a letter of caution and took no further action, according to the lawsuit. In another incident that Mr. Loscalso says he spoke up about, a broker allowed an unlicensed assistant to transact client business by processing and completing trades using the broker’s identification number.
Between the end of September 2009 and October 2009, Mr. Loscalso told “several members of management that he was considering alerting outside regulatory agencies, including The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc. and the SEC, about his concerns regarding violations of SEC rules and regulations,” according to the suit.
He was fired by Ameriprise on Nov. 5, 2009, according to the lawsuit. In a letter to Mr. Loscalso, Ameriprise managers said Mr. Loscalso was fired for cause due to a failure to supervise his advisers.
“We terminated Mr. Loscalso for performance,” wrote Chris Reese, an Ameriprise spokesman, in an e-mail. “The Department of Labor dismissed his case against Ameriprise and we will fight this baseless lawsuit vigorously.”

Related Topics:

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

New DOL rule no big deal, says Stifel’s Kruszewski

"It appears to be less restrictive than what was proposed," said Stifel CEO Kruszewski,

Advisor recruiting getting “irrational,” says Ameriprise CEO

"I do believe that the market is very competitive," says Ameriprise CEO Cracchiolo.

Solid start to wealth management deals in 2024: report

"We’re seeing continued deal flow of mid-sized and smaller RIAs, along with broker-dealers, too," one banker said.

LPL’s Chris Cassidy talks Atria deal, credit unions

'Credit unions are nonprofit institutions, so that creates a collaborative approach,' Cassidy says.

Bankrupt GWG bonds not right for anyone: Finra arbitrator

By 2020, 'GWG had shown years of losses and large negative cash flows,' a securities arbitrator writes.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print